Literature DB >> 10442715

Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy.

J M Kapatoes1, G H Olivera, P J Reckwerdt, E E Fitchard, E A Schloesser, T R Mackie.   

Abstract

Conformal and conformal avoidance radiation therapy are new therapeutic techniques that are generally characterized by high dose gradients. The success of this kind of treatment relies on quality assurance procedures in order to verify the delivery of the treatment. A delivery verification technique should consider quality assurance procedures for patient positioning and radiation delivery verification. A methodology for radiation delivery verification was developed and tested with our tomotherapy workbench. The procedure was investigated for two cases. The first treatment using a torus-shaped target was optimized for 72 beam directions and sequentially delivered as a single slice to a 33 cm diameter cylinder of homogeneous solid water. For the second treatment, a random pattern of energy fluence was helically delivered for two slices to a 9.0 cm diameter phantom containing inhomogeneities. The presented process provides the energy fluence (or a related quantity) delivered through the multileaf collimator (MLC) using the signal measured at the exit detector during the treatment delivery. As this information is created for every pulse of the accelerator, the energy fluence and state for each MLC leaf were verified on a pulse-by-pulse basis. The pulse-by-pulse results were averaged to obtain projection-by-projection information to allow for a comparison with the planned delivery. The errors between the planned and delivered energy fluences were concentrated between +/-2.0%, with none beyond +/-3.5%. In addition to accurately achieving radiation delivery verification, the process is fast, which could translate to radiation delivery verification in real time. This technique can also be extended to reconstruct the dose actually deposited in the patient or phantom (dose reconstruction).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10442715     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/44/7/318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  4 in total

1.  Treatment planning to improve delivery accuracy and patient throughput in helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  David C Westerly; Emilie Soisson; Quan Chen; Katherine Woch; Leah Schubert; Gustavo Olivera; Thomas R Mackie
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Feasibility of concurrent treatment with the scanning ultrasound reflector linear array system (SURLAS) and the helical tomotherapy system.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Eduardo Moros; Petr Novák; Yulong Yan; Peter Corry
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.914

3.  Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery for single brain metastasis.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Yulong Yan; Chengyu Shi; Mark E Linskey; Vaneerat Ratanatharathorn
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2006-08-03       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Leaf open time sinogram (LOTS): a novel approach for patient specific quality assurance of total marrow irradiation.

Authors:  Rajesh Thiyagarajan; Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma; Suryakant Kaushik; Mayur Sawant; K Ganapathy; N Arunai Nambi Raj; Srinivas Chilukuri; Sham C Sundar; Kartikeswar Ch Patro; Arjunan Manikandan; M P Noufal; Rangasamy Sivaraman; Jose Easow; Rakesh Jalali
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.