Literature DB >> 10442198

Progressive disease rate as a surrogate endpoint of phase II trials for non-small-cell lung cancer.

I Sekine1, T Tamura, H Kunitoh, K Kubota, T Shinkai, Y Kamiya, N Saijo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the potential activity of anticancer agents has been traditionally assessed by the response rate (RR) in phase II trials, there is an increasing need to identify alternative endpoints to evaluate the efficacy of novel types of antineoplastic agents such as cytostatic agents. However, none of the proposed alternatives have been validated.
DESIGN: RR, rate of progressive disease (PD), and median survival time (MST) were obtained from 44 treatment arms in 42 single-agent phase II trials for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Correlations between these parameters and their significance in selection of promising drugs were evaluated.
RESULTS: The median (range) RR and PD rate per treatment arm were 17% (0%-40%) and 41% (8%-93%), respectively. The PD rate correlated more closely with MST (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.80, P < 0.001) than did the RR (r = 0.62, P < 0.001). The RR of active agents against NSCLC ranged broadly from 7% to 40%, whereas their PD rates were all 50% or less. In addition, all treatment arms with a PD rate over 50% had a poor MST of six months or shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: The PD rate was potentially as good an endpoint as RR, and it may be a good candidate for the primary endpoint of phase II trials for novel types of anticancer agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10442198     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008303921033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  7 in total

1.  Strength of Validation for Surrogate End Points Used in the US Food and Drug Administration's Approval of Oncology Drugs.

Authors:  Chul Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Surrogate end points for survival in the target treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with gefitinib or erlotinib.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Li; Shan Liu; Hangang Gu; Deqiang Wang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  A comparison of a new multinomial stopping rule with stopping rules of fleming and gehan in single arm phase II cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  John R Goffin; Greg R Pond; Dongsheng Tu
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Does early PET/CT assesment of response to chemotherapy predicts survival in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Cetin Ordu; Nalan A Selcuk; Ezgi Erdogan; Gulden Angin; Zeynep Gural; Hatice Memis; Esin Yencilek; Sinem Dalsuna; Kezban Pilanci
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  A systematic review of meta-analyses assessing the validity of tumour response endpoints as surrogates for progression-free or overall survival in cancer.

Authors:  Katy Cooper; Paul Tappenden; Anna Cantrell; Kate Ennis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.