Literature DB >> 10441154

Backbone dynamics of the N-terminal domain in E. coli DnaJ determined by 15N- and 13CO-relaxation measurements.

K Huang1, R Ghose, J M Flanagan, J H Prestegard.   

Abstract

The backbone dynamics of the N-terminal domain of the chaperone protein Escherichia coli DnaJ have been investigated using steady-state 1H-15N NOEs, 15N T1, T2, and T1 rho relaxation times, steady-state 13C alpha-13CO NOEs, and 13CO T1 relaxation times. Two recombinant constructs of the N-terminal domain of DnaJ have been studied. One, DnaJ(1-78), contains the most conserved "J-domain" of DnaJ, and the other, DnaJ(1-104), includes a glycine/phenylalanine rich region ("G/F" region) in addition to the "J-domain". DnaJ(1-78) is not capable of stimulating ATP hydrolysis by DnaK, despite the fact that all currently identified sites responsible for DnaJ-DnaK interaction are located in this region. DnaJ(1-104), on the other hand, retains nearly the full ATPase stimulatory activity of full length DnaJ. Recently, a structural analysis of these two molecules was presented in an effort to elucidate the origin of their functional differences [Huang, K., Flanagan, J. M., and Prestegard, J. H. (1999) Protein Science 8, 203-214]. Herein, an analysis of dynamic properties is presented in a similar effort. A generalized model-free approach with a full treatment of the anisotropic overall rotation of the proteins is used in the analysis of measured relaxation parameters. Our results show that internal motions on pico- to nanosecond time scales in the backbone of DnaJ(1-78) are reduced on the inclusion of the "G/F" region, while conformational exchange on micro- to millisecond time scales increases. We speculate that the enhanced flexibility of residues on the slow time scale upon the inclusion of the "G/F" region could be relevant to the ATPase stimulatory activity of DnaJ if an "induced-fit" mechanism applies to DnaJ-DnaK interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10441154     DOI: 10.1021/bi990263+

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of (13)C(alpha)H and (15)NH backbone dynamics in protein GB1.

Authors:  Djaudat Idiyatullin; Irina Nesmelova; Vladimir A Daragan; Kevin H Mayo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Selectively dispersed isotope labeling for protein structure determination by magic angle spinning NMR.

Authors:  Matthew T Eddy; Marina Belenky; Astrid C Sivertsen; Robert G Griffin; Judith Herzfeld
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Structural study of the H/ACA snoRNP components Nop10p and the 3' hairpin of U65 snoRNA.

Authors:  May Khanna; Haihong Wu; Carina Johansson; Michèle Caizergues-Ferrer; Juli Feigon
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 4.  Not all J domains are created equal: implications for the specificity of Hsp40-Hsp70 interactions.

Authors:  Fritha Hennessy; William S Nicoll; Richard Zimmermann; Michael E Cheetham; Gregory L Blatch
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  PhosphoThr peptide binding globally rigidifies much of the FHA domain from Arabidopsis receptor kinase-associated protein phosphatase.

Authors:  Zhaofeng Ding; Gui-in Lee; Xiangyang Liang; Fabio Gallazzi; A Arunima; Steven R Van Doren
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Dissection of Swa2p/auxilin domain requirements for cochaperoning Hsp70 clathrin-uncoating activity in vivo.

Authors:  Jing Xiao; Leslie S Kim; Todd R Graham
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Structure and function of Tim14 and Tim16, the J and J-like components of the mitochondrial protein import motor.

Authors:  Dejana Mokranjac; Gleb Bourenkov; Kai Hell; Walter Neupert; Michael Groll
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Interactions between PTB RRMs induce slow motions and increase RNA binding affinity.

Authors:  Caroline M Maynard; Kathleen B Hall
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Dynamical Structures of Hsp70 and Hsp70-Hsp40 Complexes.

Authors:  Thomas Reid Alderson; Jin Hae Kim; John Lute Markley
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 10.  Pharmacological targeting of the Hsp70 chaperone.

Authors:  Srikanth Patury; Yoshinari Miyata; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.