Literature DB >> 10440725

Homeobox genes in the Australian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri.

T J Longhurst1, J M Joss.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine whether the postulated gnathostome duplication from four to eight Hox clusters occurred before or after the split between the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian fish by characterizing Hox genes from the sarcopterygian lungfish, Neoceratodus forsteri. Since lungfish have extremely large genomes, we took the approach of extracting pure high molecular weight (MW) genomic DNA to act as a template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the conserved homeobox domain of the highly conserved Hox genes. The 21 clones thus obtained were sequenced and translated in a BLASTX protein database search to designate Hox gene identity. Fourteen of the clones were from Hox genes, two were Hox pseudogenes, four were Gbx genes, and one most closely resembled the homeobox gene, insulin upstream factor 1. The Hox genes identified were from all four tetrapod clusters A, B, C, and D, confirming their presence in lungfish, and there is no evidence to suggest more than these four functional Hox clusters, as is the case in teleosts. A comparison of Hox group 13 amino acid sequences of lungfish, zebrafish, and mouse provides firm evidence that the expansion of Hox clusters, as seen in zebrafish, occurred after separation of the actinopterygian and sarcopterygian lineages. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 285:140-145, 1999. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10440725     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-010x(19990815)285:2<140::aid-jez6>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool        ISSN: 0022-104X


  6 in total

1.  Evolution of Hox clusters in Salmonidae: a comparative analysis between Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).

Authors:  Hooman K Moghadam; Moira M Ferguson; Roy G Danzmann
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Molecular evolution of the HoxA cluster in the three major gnathostome lineages.

Authors:  Chi-hua Chiu; Chris Amemiya; Ken Dewar; Chang-Bae Kim; Frank H Ruddle; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Full regeneration of the tribasal Polypterus fin.

Authors:  Rodrigo Cuervo; Rocío Hernández-Martínez; Jesús Chimal-Monroy; Horacio Merchant-Larios; Luis Covarrubias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A general scenario of Hox gene inventory variation among major sarcopterygian lineages.

Authors:  Dan Liang; Riga Wu; Jie Geng; Chaolin Wang; Peng Zhang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Hox gene clusters in the Indonesian coelacanth, Latimeria menadoensis.

Authors:  Esther G L Koh; Kevin Lam; Alan Christoffels; Mark V Erdmann; Sydney Brenner; Byrappa Venkatesh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Expression of meis and hoxa11 in dipnoan and teleost fins provides new insights into the evolution of vertebrate appendages.

Authors:  Fernanda Langellotto; Maria Fiorentino; Elena De Felice; Luigi Caputi; Valeria Nittoli; Jean M P Joss; Paolo Sordino
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 2.250

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.