Literature DB >> 10440399

A randomized double-blind, multicenter plasma concentration controlled study of the safety and efficacy of oral mycophenolate mofetil for the prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation.

T van Gelder1, L B Hilbrands, Y Vanrenterghem, W Weimar, J W de Fijter, J P Squifflet, R J Hené, G A Verpooten, M T Navarro, M D Hale, A J Nicholls.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adding a fixed dose of 1 g b.i.d. of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to an immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporine and prednisone results in a 50% reduction in the incidence of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between pharmacokinetic data (mycophenolic acid area under the curve; MPA AUC) and the prevention of rejection after kidney transplantation.
METHODS: A total of 154 adult recipients of a primary or secondary cadaveric kidney graft were randomly allocated, in this double-blind trial, to receive MMF treatment aimed at three predefined target MPA AUC values (16.1, 32.2, and 60.6 microg x hr/ml). During the first 6 months after transplantation, plasma samples for nine AUCs were collected. After analysis of the samples, a coded dose adjustment advice was generated using a Bayesian algorithm, maintaining the double blinding. Immunosuppressive therapy further consisted of cyclosporine and prednisone. The primary end point of this study was the occurrence of biopsy-proven acute rejection within the 6-month study period.
RESULTS: A total of 150 patients were eligible for analysis. Although after day 21, the mean MMF dose was reduced, the mean MPA AUC gradually increased and target MPA AUC values were exceeded in all three groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection in the low, intermediate, and high target MPA AUC groups were 14 of 51 (27.5%), 7 of 47 (14.9%), and 6 of 52 (11.5%), respectively. The incidences of premature withdrawal from the study due to adverse events in the three groups were 4 of 51 (7.8%), 11 of 47 (23.4%), and 23 of 52 (44.2%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed a highly statistically significant relationship between median ln(MPA AUC) and the occurrence of a biopsy-proven rejection (P<0.001). The logistic regression using median ln(Cpredose) was also statistically significant for this relationship (P=0.01), whereas it was not when using mean MMF dose (P=0.082). In contrast, the logistic regression using mean MMF dose for comparison of patients who successfully completed the study versus patients experiencing premature withdrawal due to adverse events was highly significant (P<0.001), whereas this was not significant when using median ln(Cpredose) (P=0.512) or median ln(MPA AUC) (P=0.434).
CONCLUSION: MPA Cpredose and MPA AUC are significantly related to the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection after kidney transplantation, whereas MMF dose is significantly related to the occurrence of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10440399     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199907270-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  82 in total

Review 1.  Concentration-controlled or effect-controlled trials: useful alternatives to conventional dose-controlled trials?

Authors:  A Grahnén; M O Karlsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and metabolites in patients with glomerulonephritis.

Authors:  Wai-Johnn Sam; Melanie S Joy
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.681

3.  Inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase 1 haplotypes and association with mycophenolate mofetil gastrointestinal intolerance in pediatric heart transplant patients.

Authors:  Erin L Ohmann; Gilbert J Burckart; Yan Chen; Vera Pravica; Maria M Brooks; Adriana Zeevi; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2010-11

Review 4.  Mycophenolate mofetil: fully utilizing its benefits for GvHD prophylaxis.

Authors:  Kentaro Minagawa; Motohiro Yamamori; Yoshio Katayama; Toshimitsu Matsui
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Clinical mycophenolic acid monitoring in liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Bing Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of mycophenolate in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christine E Staatz; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and determination of area under the curve by abbreviated sampling strategy in Chinese liver transplant recipients.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Chenghong Peng; Zhicheng Yu; Baiyong Shen; Xiaxing Deng; Weihua Qiu; Yue Fei; Chuan Shen; Guangwen Zhou; Weiping Yang; Hongwei Li
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Randomized exposure-controlled trials; impact of randomization and analysis strategies.

Authors:  Kristin E Karlsson; Anders Grahnén; Mats O Karlsson; E Niclas Jonsson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics and related outcomes early after renal transplant.

Authors:  Bronwyn A Atcheson; Paul J Taylor; David W Mudge; David W Johnson; Carmel M Hawley; Scott B Campbell; Nicole M Isbel; Peter I Pillans; Susan E Tett
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Pharmacokinetic role of protein binding of mycophenolic acid and its glucuronide metabolite in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  Brenda C M de Winter; Teun van Gelder; Ferdi Sombogaard; Leslie M Shaw; Reinier M van Hest; Ron A A Mathot
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.745

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.