Literature DB >> 10439504

An analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference.

D J Burns1, D E Gold.   

Abstract

The repeated-testing paradigm is used to study both retroactive interference and hypermnesia (the improvement in memory across repeated tests). Considerable theoretical progress has been made by separately analyzing the 2 components of hypermnesia: the recovery of previously unrecalled items on later tests (item gains) and the forgetting of previously recalled items on later tests (item losses). Item gains increase with increases in item-specific processing, whereas item losses decrease with increases in relational processing. The authors suggest that separate analysis of item gains and losses in retroactive interference research may also prove fruitful. Three experiments showed that an interpolated list affects item gains but not losses, whereas processing similarity between the target and interpolated lists affects losses but not gains. These results are interpreted within the relational-item-specific processing framework.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10439504     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.25.4.978

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  6 in total

1.  Retroactive interference from translation equivalents: implications for first language forgetting.

Authors:  L Isurin; J L McDonald
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Memory for actions: item and relational information in categorized lists.

Authors:  Johannes Engelkamp; Kerstin H Seiler; Hubert D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-12-23

3.  Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Marquinn D Duke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

4.  Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Courtney C Dornburg; Melissa J Guynn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

5.  Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.

Authors:  Daniel J Burns; Carin L Jenkins; Erica E Dean
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

6.  Unannounced memory tests are not necessarily unexpected by participants: test expectation and its consequences in the repeated test paradigm.

Authors:  Aileen Oeberst; Isabel Lindner
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-06-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.