Literature DB >> 10438435

Obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies after intrauterine insemination.

S Nuojua-Huttunen1, M Gissler, H Martikainen, L Tuomivaara.   

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancies after intrauterine insemination (IUI) with the partner's spermatozoa combined with ovarian stimulation. Information concerning the antenatal care and obstetric and perinatal outcome of IUI pregnancies (n = 111), spontaneous (n = 333) and in-vitro fertilization (IVF) (n = 333) was obtained from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR). The multiple birth rate in the IUI group was 17% (19/111). Significantly less antenatal care was required by the IUI group than the IVF group. The frequency of Caesarean section was 25% for IUI singletons and 58% for IUI multiples, similar to the other groups. The mean (SD) gestational age for IUI singletons at birth was 39.5 (1.8) weeks, with a mean birth weight of 3285 (575) g, compared with 3448 (600) g in non-assisted singletons (P < 0.05). For IUI multiples the mean gestational age at birth was 36.0 (2.8) weeks and the mean birth weight was 2449 (678) g. The incidence of preterm birth, low birth weight or low Apgar scores and the need for neonatal care were similar in all groups. One case of major malformation and two perinatal deaths were recorded in the IUI group. In conclusion, IUI treatment did not appear to increase obstetric or perinatal risks compared with matched spontaneous or IVF pregnancies. Most problems were associated with patient characteristics and multiple pregnancy. Reduction of the high incidence of multiple pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology is essential to improve its outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10438435     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.8.2110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

Review 1.  Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Frans M Helmerhorst; Denise A M Perquin; Diane Donker; Marc J N C Keirse
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-23

2.  Identifying women with indicators of subfertility in a statewide population database: operationalizing the missing link in assisted reproductive technology research.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Pregnant after assisted reproduction: a risk pregnancy is born! 18-years perinatal outcome results from a population-based registry in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  W Ombelet; G Martens; L Bruckers
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2016-12

4.  The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Abdelkader; John Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009

5.  Monitoring of IVF birth outcomes in Finland: a data quality study.

Authors:  Mika Gissler; Reija Klemetti; Tiina Sevón; Elina Hemminki
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.796

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.