Literature DB >> 10433898

Protected Values and Omission Bias.

.   

Abstract

Protected values (PVs) are those that people think should not be traded off. Baron and Spranca (1997) proposed that such values result from rules concerning actions (as opposed to values for outcomes). This proposal implies that PVs should show a particularly large bias against harmful acts that undermine the value in question, as opposed to harmful omissions (omission bias). We found this correlation between PVs and omission bias in 3 experiments, using stimuli of the sort that we used before to demonstrate omission bias. In 2 experiments, we also found a weak tendency for PVs to be associated with lack of concern for the number of acts involved, which is analogous to earlier results showing an association with lack of concern for the quantity of outcomes. Finally, 1 experiment showed that some people are willing to sacrifice values to prevent losses more than they are willing to sacrifice these values for gains. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 10433898     DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process        ISSN: 0749-5978


  12 in total

1.  Judgment before principle: engagement of the frontoparietal control network in condemning harms of omission.

Authors:  Fiery Cushman; Dylan Murray; Shauna Gordon-McKeon; Sophie Wharton; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  A meta-analysis of response-time tests of the sequential two-systems model of moral judgment.

Authors:  Jonathan Baron; Burcu Gürçay
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

3.  A regret-induced status quo bias.

Authors:  Antoinette Nicolle; Stephen M Fleming; Dominik R Bach; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis.

Authors:  Wenjia Joyce Zhao; Aoife Coady; Sudeep Bhatia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Infants' representations of others' goals: representing approach over avoidance.

Authors:  Roman Feiman; Susan Carey; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  Protected values: no omission bias and no framing effects.

Authors:  Carmen Tanner; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

7.  Is there an omission effect in prosocial behavior? A laboratory experiment on passive vs. active generosity.

Authors:  Manja Gärtner; Anna Sandberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Decision makers use norms, not cost-benefit analysis, when choosing to conceal or reveal unfair rewards.

Authors:  Marco Heimann; Vittorio Girotto; Paolo Legrenzi; Jean-François Bonnefon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Switching Away from Utilitarianism: The Limited Role of Utility Calculations in Moral Judgment.

Authors:  Mark Sheskin; Nicolas Baumard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Moral judgment as information processing: an integrative review.

Authors:  Steve Guglielmo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.