Literature DB >> 21368043

A regret-induced status quo bias.

Antoinette Nicolle1, Stephen M Fleming, Dominik R Bach, Jon Driver, Raymond J Dolan.   

Abstract

A suboptimal bias toward accepting the status quo option in decision-making is well established behaviorally, but the underlying neural mechanisms are less clear. Behavioral evidence suggests the emotion of regret is higher when errors arise from rejection rather than acceptance of a status quo option. Such asymmetry in the genesis of regret might drive the status quo bias on subsequent decisions, if indeed erroneous status quo rejections have a greater neuronal impact than erroneous status quo acceptances. To test this, we acquired human fMRI data during a difficult perceptual decision task that incorporated a trial-to-trial intrinsic status quo option, with explicit signaling of outcomes (error or correct). Behaviorally, experienced regret was higher after an erroneous status quo rejection compared with acceptance. Anterior insula and medial prefrontal cortex showed increased blood oxygenation level-dependent signal after such status quo rejection errors. In line with our hypothesis, a similar pattern of signal change predicted acceptance of the status quo on a subsequent trial. Thus, our data link a regret-induced status quo bias to error-related activity on the preceding trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21368043      PMCID: PMC3059787          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5615-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Modeling geometric deformations in EPI time series.

Authors:  J L Andersson; C Hutton; J Ashburner; R Turner; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Error-related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task.

Authors:  V Menon; N E Adleman; C D White; G H Glover; A L Reiss
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The inaction effect in the psychology of regret.

Authors:  Marcel Zeelenberg; Kees van de Bos; Eric van Dijk; Rik Pieters
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2002-03

4.  The neural basis of financial risk taking.

Authors:  Camelia M Kuhnen; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Hugo Critchley; Ralf Deichmann; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance.

Authors:  C S Carter; T S Braver; D M Barch; M M Botvinick; D Noll; J D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Lisa M Shin; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Functional dissociation in frontal and striatal areas for processing of positive and negative reward information.

Authors:  Xun Liu; David K Powell; Hongbin Wang; Brian T Gold; Christine R Corbly; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Amygdala involvement in self-blame regret.

Authors:  Antoinette Nicolle; Dominik R Bach; Chris Frith; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.083

10.  Time-series analysis for rapid event-related skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Guillaume Flandin; Karl J Friston; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  11 in total

1.  The status quo bias and decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  Jonathan Breslin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Behavioral Nudges to Improve Enrollment in Critical Care Trials.

Authors:  Dustin C Krutsinger; Kelly L O'Leary; Susan S Ellenberg; Cody E Cotner; Scott D Halpern; Katherine R Courtright
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-09

3.  Stochastic satisficing account of confidence in uncertain value-based decisions.

Authors:  Uri Hertz; Bahador Bahrami; Mehdi Keramati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reward Sensitivity Enhances Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation during Free Choice.

Authors:  Catherine Cho; David V Smith; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Nonequivalent modulation of corticospinal excitability by positive and negative outcomes.

Authors:  Makoto Suzuki; Toyohiro Hamaguchi; Atsuhiko Matsunaga
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  Response repetition biases in human perceptual decisions are explained by activity decay in competitive attractor models.

Authors:  James J Bonaiuto; Archy de Berker; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Perceived Barriers and Facilitators for Bedtime Routines in Families with Young Children.

Authors:  George Kitsaras; Michaela Goodwin; Michael Kelly; Iain Pretty; Julia Allan
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15

8.  Distinguishing Active and Passive Outgroup Tolerance: Understanding Its Prevalence and the Role of Moral Concern.

Authors:  Levi Adelman; Maykel Verkuyten; Kumar Yogeeswaran
Journal:  Polit Psychol       Date:  2021-11-12

9.  Optimising a model-based approach to inferring fear learning from skin conductance responses.

Authors:  Matthias Staib; Giuseppe Castegnetti; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Modeling event-related heart period responses.

Authors:  Philipp C Paulus; Giuseppe Castegnetti; Dominik R Bach
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.