Literature DB >> 10432886

Efficacy of two sputum collection techniques in patients with air flow obstruction.

T C Kennedy1, S P Proudfoot, S Piantadosi, L Wu, G Saccomanno, T L Petty, M S Tockman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of two sputum collection techniques in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in order to diagnose dysplasia or neoplasia. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a crossover study design comparing induced sputum with sputum collected at home. One hundred seven patients with COPD were enrolled. Fifty-six were randomized to collect induced sputum first followed by sputum collection at home. Fifty-one randomly assigned patients collected the sputum in reverse order.
RESULTS: The second sputum collection technique for both random assignments gave the greatest yield of adequate sputum. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the collection of the two sputum collection techniques in the presence of the learning (period) effect.
CONCLUSION: Sputum collection is equally efficacious by the induced method and the home collection method. A learning effect was responsible for the increased yield of sputum abnormalities in the second collection session. Sputum collection at home may facilitate the amount of dysplasic and neoplastic bronchial epithelial changes in heavy smokers with COPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10432886     DOI: 10.1159/000331157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sputum examination for early detection of lung cancer.

Authors:  F B J M Thunnissen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Interphase cytogenetics of sputum cells for the early detection of lung carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Sheila A Prindiville; Thomas Ried
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-03-23

3.  Detection of Promoter DNA Methylation in Urine and Plasma Aids the Detection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Julio Ricarte Filho; Apurva Mallisetty; Cassandra Villani; Anastasia Kottorou; Kristen Rodgers; Chen Chen; Tomoaki Ito; Kyla Holmes; Nicole Gastala; Klara Valyi-Nagy; Odile David; Ron C Gaba; Christian Ascoli; Mary Pasquinelli; Lawrence E Feldman; Malek G Massad; Tza-Huei Wang; Ignacio Jusue-Torres; Enrico Benedetti; Robert A Winn; Malcolm V Brock; James G Herman; Alicia Hulbert
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Defining a gene promoter methylation signature in sputum for lung cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Shuguang Leng; Kieu Do; Christin M Yingling; Maria A Picchi; Holly J Wolf; Timothy C Kennedy; William J Feser; Anna E Baron; Wilbur A Franklin; Malcolm V Brock; James G Herman; Stephen B Baylin; Tim Byers; Christine A Stidley; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Gene Methylation Biomarkers in Sputum and Plasma as Predictors for Lung Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Steven A Belinsky; Shuguang Leng; Guodong Wu; Cynthia L Thomas; Maria A Picchi; Sandra J Lee; Seena Aisner; Suresh Ramalingam; Fadlo R Khuri; Daniel D Karp
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-09-13

6.  Gene methylation biomarkers in sputum as a classifier for lung cancer risk.

Authors:  Shuguang Leng; Guodong Wu; Donna M Klinge; Cynthia L Thomas; Elia Casas; Maria A Picchi; Christine A Stidley; Sandra J Lee; Seena Aisner; Jill M Siegfried; Suresh Ramalingam; Fadlo R Khuri; Daniel D Karp; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.