Literature DB >> 10430687

Peritoneal response to a septic challenge. Comparison between open laparotomy, pneumoperitoneum laparoscopy, and wall lift laparoscopy.

C Balagué1, E M Targarona, M Pujol, X Filella, J J Espert, M Trias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has a lower incidence of surgical infection than open surgery. Differential factors that may modify the bacterial biology and explain this finding to some extent include CO(2) atmosphere, less desiccation of intraabdominal structures, fewer temperature changes, and a better preserved peritoneal and systemic immune response. Previous data suggest that the immune response and acute phase response are better preserved after laparoscopy. Therefore, we designed a study to evaluate the early peritoneal response to sepsis in an experimental peritonitis model comparing open surgery with CO(2) and abdominal wall lift laparoscopy.
METHODS: The study subjects comprised 360 mice distributed into the following four groups: group 1, n = 72 (controls); group 2, n = 96 (open surgery), 2-3 cm laparotomy, with abdominal cavity exposed to the air for 30 min; group 3, n = 96, CO(2) laparoscopy (5 mmHg pneumoperitoneum) for 30 min; group 4, n = 96, wall lift laparoscopy for 30 min. Intraabdominal contamination in the four groups was induced with 1 ml of E. coli suspension (1 x 10(4) CFU/ml) 10 min before abdomen closure. Peritoneal fluid and blood samples were obtained 1.5, 3, 24, and 72 h after surgery, and TNF, IL-1, and IL-6 were measured (via ELISA), as well as quantitative culture.
RESULTS: The number of CFU (colony-forming units) obtained in peritoneal fluid and positive blood culture rates were significantly lower in the laparoscopic groups than in the open group. IL-1 peritoneal levels were significantly lower after 24 h and 72 h in the laparoscopy groups. IL-6 levels decreased sharply in the laparoscopy groups at 24 h and 72 h. There were no differences between the two types of laparoscopy models (CO(2) and wall lift).
CONCLUSIONS: Peritoneal response to sepsis is better preserved after laparoscopy than after open surgery. CO(2) does not seem to influence bacterial growth. According to these findings, laparoscopy entails less local trauma and better preserved intraabdominal conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10430687     DOI: 10.1007/s004649901101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  The management of leaking rectal anastomoses by minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  M Pera; S Delgado; J C García-Valdecasas; M Pera; A Castells; J M Piqué; E Bombuy; A M Lacy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.

Authors:  M Buunen; M Gholghesaei; R Veldkamp; D W Meijer; H J Bonjer; N D Bouvy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Y W Novitsky; D E M Litwin; M P Callery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Immediate peritoneal response to bacterial contamination during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  E M Targarona; M Rodríguez; M Camacho; C Balagué; I Gich; L Vila; M Trias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Protective effect of carbon dioxide against bacterial peritonitis induced in rats.

Authors:  Albino Augusto Sorbello; Joao Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Junko Takano Osaka; Sueli Damy; Luiz Mattosinho França; Erasmo Carlos Tolosa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Advantages of laparoscopic compared to conventional surgery are not related to an innate immune response of peritoneal immune activation: an animal study in rats.

Authors:  Philipp Lingohr; Jonas Dohmen; Hanno Matthaei; Timo Schwandt; Kathy Stein; Gun-Soo Hong; Julia Steitz; Thomas Longerich; Edwin Bölke; Sven Wehner; Jörg C Kalff
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Inflammatory response and bacterial dissemination after laparotomy and abdominal CO2 insufflation in a murine model of peritonitis.

Authors:  M B Pitombo; O H Lupi; R N Gomes; R Amâncio; R A Refinetti; P T Bozza; H C Castro-Faria-Neto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open ileo-colonic resection in Crohn's disease: short- and long-term results from a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Giuseppe S Sica; Edoardo Iaculli; Domenico Benavoli; Livia Biancone; Emma Calabrese; Sara Onali; Achille L Gaspari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Effects of pneumoperitoneum created through CO2 insufflation and parameters of mechanical ventilation (PEEP application) on systemic dissemination of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  U Barbaros; S Ozarmagan; Y Erbil; A Bozbora; N Cakar; H Eraksoy; Y Kapran; B Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic bowel injury: role of the site and the instrument type: study with an animal model.

Authors:  C Tsigris; A Tsechpenakis; N Nikiteas; I Tzogios; I S Vlachos; Th Diamantis; D N Perrea
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.