Literature DB >> 10429597

Interface gap after implantation of a cemented femoral stem in pigs.

J S Wang1, H Franzén, L Lidgren.   

Abstract

We studied the interface gap around cemented femoral stems. Fresh pig femora were used. Bone cement mixed under vacuum or at atmospheric pressure was injected into the femoral canal and a cobalt chrome stem was then implanted. The femora were sectioned transversely from the minor trochanter and distally by using a high-pressure water cutter. Most of the interfaces had intimate contact. However, in all specimens, small gaps were found at the bone-cement and cement-stem interfaces. The gaps at the interfaces between the bone and cement and the cement and stem were measured, using a computerized video digital system. They occupied about 10% of the circumference at the bone-cement interface and about 15% of the circumference at the cement-stem interface, irrespective of the mixing procedures. Most gaps were less than 100 mu at the interfaces. In conclusion, cemented implants in the animal model showed that small gaps are found at the interfaces directly after implantation. These gaps may be weak points and initiate debonding when loading the prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10429597     DOI: 10.3109/17453679908997799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand        ISSN: 0001-6470


  6 in total

1.  Stem-cement porosity may explain early loosening of cemented femoral hip components: experimental-computational in vitro study.

Authors:  Kenneth A Mann; Leatha A Damron; Mark A Miller; Amos Race; Michael T Clarke; Richard J Cleary
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Authors:  Daan Waanders; Dennis Janssen; Kenneth A Mann; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Gentamicin release from commercially-available gentamicin-loaded PMMA bone cements in a prosthesis-related interfacial gap model and their antibacterial efficacy.

Authors:  Daniëlle Neut; Otto S Kluin; Jonathan Thompson; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Random damage and characteristics of debris particles are two important and yet ignored factors in the mechanical integrity of the stem-cement interface of a total hip replacement: influence of the surface finish of the metal stem.

Authors:  Gang Qi; Steven F Wayne; Kenneth A Mann; Bin Zhang; Gladius Lewis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Copal bone cement is more effective in preventing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.

Authors:  Geert T Ensing; Jim R van Horn; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher; Daniëlle Neut
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical effects of morphological variations of the cortical wall at the bone-cement interface.

Authors:  Chun-Lin Zhang; Guo-Qi Shen; Kun-Peng Zhu; Dong-Xu Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.359

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.