Literature DB >> 10425842

Should Medicare HMO benefits be standardized?

P D Fox1, R Snyder, G Dallek, T Rice.   

Abstract

Legislation enacted in 1990 standardized Medigap benefits but not the benefits of health maintenance organizations (HMOs) that serve Medicare beneficiaries. An examination of marketing materials in two large counties reveals the potential for enormous confusion among beneficiaries because of differences in wording to describe the same benefit, health plans' failure to list Medicare-covered services, and the differences in the benefits themselves. To date, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has not been able to overcome this confusion through the comparative material distributed on its Web site; indeed, significant errors were found, reflecting to some extent the underlying difficulties in characterizing benefits. Ways of ameliorating the situation are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10425842     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.4.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  4 in total

1.  Medigap premiums and Medicare HMO enrollment.

Authors:  Catherine G McLaughlin; Michael Chernew; Erin Fries Taylor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Can limiting choice increase social welfare? The elderly and health insurance.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 3.  Confusing inequitable medicare prescription drug benefit.

Authors:  Gail E Shearer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Medigap reform legislation of 1990: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Peter D Fox; Rani E Snyder; Thomas Rice
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.