Literature DB >> 12546281

Medigap premiums and Medicare HMO enrollment.

Catherine G McLaughlin1, Michael Chernew, Erin Fries Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Markets for Medicare HMOs (health maintenance organizations) and supplemental Medicare coverage are often treated separately in existing literature. Yet because managed care plans and Medigap plans both cover services not covered by basic Medicare, these markets are clearly interrelated. We examine the extent to which Medigap premiums affect the likelihood of the elderly joining managed care plans. DATA SOURCES: The analysis is based on a sample of Medicare beneficiaries drawn from the 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household Survey by the Center for Studying Health System Change. Respondents span 56 different CTS sites from 30 different states. Measures of premiums for privately-purchased Medigap policies were collected from a survey of large insurers serving this market. Data for individual, market, and HMO characteristics were collected from the CTS, InterStudy, and HCFA (Health Care Financing Administration). STUDY
DESIGN: Our analysis uses a reduced-form logit model to estimate the probability of Medicare HMO participation as a function of Medigap premiums controlling for other market- and individual-level characteristics. The logit coefficients were then used to simulate changes in Medicare participation in response to changes in Medigap premiums. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found that Medigap premiums vary considerably among the geographic markets included in our sample. Measures of premiums from different insurers and for different types of Medigap policies were generally highly correlated across markets. Our models consistently indicate a strong positive relationship between Medigap premiums and HMO participation. This result is robust across several specifications. Simulations suggest that a one standard deviation increase in Medigap premiums would increase HMO participation by more than 8 percentage points.
CONCLUSIONS: This research provides strong evidence that Medigap premiums have a significant effect on seniors' participation in Medicare HMOs. Policy initiatives aimed at lowering Medigap premiums will likely discourage enrollment in Medicare HMOs, holding other factors constant. Although the Medigap premiums are just one factor affecting the future penetration rate of Medicare HMOs, they are an important driver of HMO enrollment and should be considered carefully when creating policy related to seniors' supplemental coverage. Similarly, our results imply that reforms to the Medicare HMO market would influence the demand for Medigap policies.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12546281      PMCID: PMC1464046          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.10832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  23 in total

1.  Adverse selection and the purchase of Medigap insurance by the elderly.

Authors:  S L Ettner
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The effect of HMOs on fee-for-service health care expenditures: evidence from Medicare.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Selection bias in TEFRA at-risk HMOs.

Authors:  R Lichtenstein; J W Thomas; J Adams-Watson; J Lepkowski; B Simone
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Adverse selection, moral hazard, and wealth effects in the Medigap insurance market.

Authors:  J R Wolfe; J H Goddeeris
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Long-term determinants of patterns of health insurance coverage in the Medicare population.

Authors:  L Lillard; J Rogowski; R Kington
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1997-06

6.  Growth in HMO share of the Medicare market, 1989-1994.

Authors:  W P Welch
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Biased selection and Medicare HMOs: analysis of the 1989-1994 experience.

Authors:  D F Cox; C Hogan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Selection bias in HMOs and PPOs: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  F J Hellinger
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Demand for insurance by elderly persons: private purchases and employer provision.

Authors:  D G Shea; R P Stewart
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Health status of Medicare enrollees in HMOs and fee-for-service in 1994.

Authors:  G Riley; C Tudor; Y P Chiang; M Ingber
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1996
View more
  4 in total

1.  Limited Medigap Consumer Protections Are Associated With Higher Reenrollment In Medicare Advantage Plans.

Authors:  David J Meyers; Amal N Trivedi; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Disenrollment from Medicare managed care among beneficiaries with and without a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Elena B Elkin; Nicole Ishill; Gerald F Riley; Peter B Bach; Mithat Gonen; Colin B Begg; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  M+C plan county exit decisions 1999-2001: implications for payment policy.

Authors:  Rachel Halpern
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Premium rebates and the quiet consensus on market reform for Medicare.

Authors:  R Feldman; B E Dowd; R Coulam; L Nichols; A Mutti
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.