Literature DB >> 10424835

Use of focus groups to identify concerns about dialysis. Choice Study.

E B Bass1, M W Jenckes, N E Fink, K A Cagney, A W Wu, J H Sadler, K B Meyer, A S Levey, N R Powe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may have quality-of-life (QOL) concerns that are not fully appreciated by their providers. The authors conducted focus groups with dialysis patients and dialysis professionals to determine whether this qualitative method would reveal differences between patients' and providers' views about: 1) domains of QOL that are affected by ESRD and dialysis; and 2) aspects of dialysis that affect QOL.
METHODS: Separate focus group discussions were held with: 8 adult hemodialysis patients (mean age 50 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 8.5 years), 5 adult peritoneal dialysis patients (mean age 54 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 4.6 years), 8 nephrologists (mean of 12 years of dialysis practice), and 9 other health professionals involved in dialysis care (3 nurses, 2 dietitians, 2 social workers, and 2 technicians; mean of 10 years experience in dialysis care). Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and reviewed independently by three investigators to identify and categorize distinct thoughts.
RESULTS: 1,271 distinct thoughts were identified and grouped into 20 related categories, which included ten QOL domains and ten aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Compared with the professionals, the patients identified one additional relevant QOL domain (10 vs 9), and one additional aspect of dialysis that affects QOL (10 vs 9), and expressed more thoughts per domain (p < 0.05), although the contents of their comments were frequently similar. Among QOL domains, the numbers of related thoughts identified by patients and professionals, respectively, were: freedom/control (60, 89); social relationships (36, 11); anxiety (37, 4); role function (24, 10); energy (12, 10); body image (16, 4); sex (11, 21); mental attitude (21, 0); sleep (15, 1), and cognitive function (13, 7). Among aspects of dialysis that affect QOL, the numbers of thoughts identified by patients and professionals were: general dialysis issues (159, 105); relationships with staff (62, 110); patient education (63, 68); diet (44, 40); scheduling (57, 3); vascular or peritoneal access issues (31, 17), adaptation to dialysis (16, 14); dialysis dose (18, 8); symptoms (25, 0), and self-care (5, 24).
CONCLUSIONS: Although health professionals have a good understanding of patient concerns about the effects of ESRD and dialysis, the focus group discussions revealed a breadth and depth of QOL concerns that they may not fully appreciate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424835     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  17 in total

1.  Issues in conducting cross-cultural research: implementation of an agreed international protocol [corrected] designed by the WHOQOL Group for the conduct of focus groups eliciting the quality of life of older adults.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Natasha Davidson; Kathryn Quinn; Farah McCrate; Ines Winkler; Ramona Lucas; Reinhold Kilian; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Health related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Mark Unruh
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Understanding and assessing the impact of end-stage renal disease on quality of life: a systematic review of the content validity of self-administered instruments used to assess health-related quality of life in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Cheryl Glover; Pauline Banks; Amanda Carson; Colin R Martin; Tim Duffy
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context.

Authors:  Anna Winterbottom; Hilary L Bekker; Mark Conner; Andrew Mooney
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Renal replacement Therapy and Barriers to choice: using a Mixed Methods approach to explore the Patient's Perspective.

Authors:  Caroline Jennette; Vimal Derebail; Judy Baldwin; Sandra Cameron
Journal:  J Nephrol Soc Work       Date:  2009

6.  Survival disparities in patients with lymphoma according to place of residence and treatment provider: a population-based study.

Authors:  Fausto R Loberiza; Anthony J Cannon; Dennis D Weisenburger; Julie M Vose; Matt J Moehr; Martin A Bast; Philip J Bierman; R Gregory Bociek; James O Armitage
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tanjala S Purnell; Priscilla Auguste; Deidra C Crews; Julio Lamprea-Montealegre; Temitope Olufade; Raquel Greer; Patti Ephraim; Johanna Sheu; Daniel Kostecki; Neil R Powe; Hamid Rabb; Bernard Jaar; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  The views of patients and carers in treatment decision making for chronic kidney disease: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  R L Morton; A Tong; K Howard; P Snelling; A C Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19

9.  Development of a decision aid to inform patients' and families' renal replacement therapy selection decisions.

Authors:  Jessica M Ameling; Priscilla Auguste; Patti L Ephraim; LaPricia Lewis-Boyer; Nicole DePasquale; Raquel C Greer; Deidra C Crews; Neil R Powe; Hamid Rabb; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Selecting renal replacement therapies: what do African American and non-African American patients and their families think others should know? A mixed methods study.

Authors:  Nicole DePasquale; Patti L Ephraim; Jessica Ameling; Lapricia Lewis-Boyér; Deidra C Crews; Raquel C Greer; Hamid Rabb; Neil R Powe; Bernard G Jaar; Luis Gimenez; Priscilla Auguste; Mollie Jenckes; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.