Literature DB >> 10424420

Altered responses of human elbow flexors to peripheral-nerve and cortical stimulation during a sustained maximal voluntary contraction.

J L Taylor1, J E Butler, S C Gandevia.   

Abstract

The short-latency electromyographic response evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (MEP) increases in size during fatigue, but the mechanisms are unclear. Because large changes occur in the muscle action potential, we tested whether changes in the response to stimulation of the peripheral motor nerve could fully account for the increase in the MEP. Subjects (n=8) performed sustained maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the right elbow flexors for 2 min. During the contraction, the MEP and the response to supramaximal stimulation of motor-nerve fibres in the brachial plexus were alternately recorded. During the contraction, responses to motor-nerve stimulation increased in area by 87+/-35% (mean+/-SD) in the biceps brachii and 74+/-30% in the brachioradialis, but the area of the MEPs increased by 153+/-86% and 175+/-122%, respectively. Thus, the increase in the MEP was greater than the increase in the peripheral M-wave. The onset latency of the MEP in the biceps brachii increased by 0.7+/-0.6 ms (range: -0.2 to 1.9 ms) during the sustained contraction. A smaller increase occurred in response to peripheral nerve stimulation (0.3+/-0.3 ms; from -0.3 to 0.9 ms). In the contralateral elbow flexors, neither responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation nor responses to motor-nerve stimulation changed in size or latency. During the sustained contraction, the short silent period after stimulation of the peripheral nerve (48+/-5 ms in biceps brachii and 48+/-4 ms in brachioradialis) increased in duration by about 12 ms (to 61+/-12 ms and 60+/-9 ms, respectively), whereas the silent period following transcranial magnetic stimulation increased from 238+/-39 ms in biceps brachii and 243+/-34 ms in brachioradialis to 325+/-41 ms and 343+/-42 ms, respectively. During a sustained MVC, while the motor responses to peripheral and to cortical stimulation grow concurrently, growth of the MEP cannot be entirely accounted for by changes in the muscle action potential. Hence, some of the increase in MEP size during fatigue must reflect changes in the central nervous system. Increased latency of the MEPs and lengthening of the peripherally evoked silent period are consistent with decreased excitability of the alpha motoneurone pool. Thus, an increased response from the motor cortex to the magnetic stimulus remains a likely contributor to the increase in the size of the MEP in fatigue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10424420     DOI: 10.1007/s002210050779

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Experiments using transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in man could reveal important new mechanisms in motor control.

Authors:  S A Edgley; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Ischaemia after exercise does not reduce responses of human motoneurones to cortical or corticospinal tract stimulation.

Authors:  J L Taylor; N Petersen; J E Butler; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The effect of a contralateral contraction on maximal voluntary activation and central fatigue in elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Nicolas T Petersen; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Measurement of voluntary activation of fresh and fatigued human muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Hyperthermia: a failure of the motor cortex and the muscle.

Authors:  Gabrielle Todd; Jane E Butler; Janet L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Short-interval cortical inhibition and corticomotor excitability with fatiguing hand exercise: a central adaptation to fatigue?

Authors:  Nicola M Benwell; Paul Sacco; Geoff R Hammond; Michelle L Byrnes; Frank L Mastaglia; Gary W Thickbroom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Corticospinal output and loss of force during motor fatigue.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; O Scheidegger; M R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Stressor-induced increase in muscle fatigability of young men and women is predicted by strength but not voluntary activation.

Authors:  Manda L Keller-Ross; Hugo M Pereira; Jaclyn Pruse; Tejin Yoon; Bonnie Schlinder-Delap; Kristy A Nielson; Sandra K Hunter
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-02-13

9.  Cortical excitability changes following grasping exercise augmented with electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Gergely I Barsi; Dejan B Popovic; Ina M Tarkka; Thomas Sinkjaer; Michael J Grey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Activity-dependent depression of the recurrent discharge of human motoneurones after maximal voluntary contractions.

Authors:  Serajul I Khan; Sabine Giesebrecht; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.