Literature DB >> 10423659

Comparison of telmisartan with lisinopril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.

J M Neutel1, W H Frishman, S Oparil, V Papademitriou, G Guthrie.   

Abstract

In this study, telmisartan, a new angiotensin AT ( 1 ) receptor antagonist given as monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), was compared with lisinopril as monotherapy and in combination with HCTZ. This 52-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, dose-titration study of 578 patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (mean diastolic blood pressure [DBP], >/=95 mm Hg), compared the efficacy and safety of telmisartan (n = 385) with lisinopril (n = 193). Dosage could be increased for both telmisartan (40 --> 80 --> 160 mg) and lisinopril (10 --> 20 --> 40 mg) at each of the first 2 monthly visits if DBP control (<90 mm Hg) had not been established. Once DBP control was established, patients entered the 48-week maintenance period. During this period, the dose of the study drug was fixed, although open-label HCTZ at 12.5 mg or 25 mg was added, when needed, to regain DBP control. At the end of the titration period, DBP control was achieved on monotherapy by 67% and 63% of the telmisartan and lisinopril patients, respectively. At the end of the maintenance period, supine DBP was controlled in 83% and 87% of the telmisartan and lisinopril patients, respectively, with systolic blood pressure over DBP reductions of 23.8/16.6 mm Hg for telmisartan and 19.9/15.6 mm Hg for lisinopril. Treatment-related side effects occurred in fewer telmisartan-treated patients (28%) than in lisinopril-treated patients (40%; P =.001). Significantly fewer patients (P =.018) receiving telmisartan experienced treatment-related cough (3% v 7%), and cough led to discontinuation significantly less often (P =.007) with telmisartan treatment than with lisinopril treatment (0.3% v 3.1%). In addition, two cases of angioedema were observed, both in the lisinopril group. The selective AT (1) receptor antagonist, telmisartan, is extremely effective in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension both as monotherapy and in combination with HCTZ and is at least comparable in efficacy to lisinopril, with a tolerability profile that may offer advantages in terms of a reduced incidence of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10423659     DOI: 10.1097/00045391-199905000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ther        ISSN: 1075-2765            Impact factor:   2.688


  12 in total

Review 1.  Updated report on comparative effectiveness of ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and direct renin inhibitors for patients with essential hypertension: much more data, little new information.

Authors:  Benjamin J Powers; Remy R Coeytaux; Rowena J Dolor; Vic Hasselblad; Uptal D Patel; William S Yancy; Rebecca N Gray; R Julian Irvine; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.

Authors:  Anna J Battershill; Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Telmisartan: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  M Sharpe; B Jarvis; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Therapeutic trials comparing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers.

Authors:  W J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan.

Authors:  Domenico Galzerano; Cristina Capogrosso; Sara Di Michele; Antonio Galzerano; Paola Paparello; Diana Lama; Carlo Gaudio
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-03-24

6.  Comparison of telmisartan vs. valsartan in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  George Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Incidence of adverse events with telmisartan compared with ACE inhibitors: evidence from a pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Helmut Schumacher
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  Hydrogen sulfide-dependent microvascular vasodilation is improved following chronic sulfhydryl-donating antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in adults with hypertension.

Authors:  Gabrielle A Dillon; Anna E Stanhewicz; Corinna Serviente; Jody L Greaney; Lacy M Alexander
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 5.125

Review 9.  Comparative effects of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  William B White
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Evaluation of angiotensin II receptor blockers for 24-hour blood pressure control: meta-analysis of a clinical database.

Authors:  Joel Neutel; David H G Smith
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.