Literature DB >> 10421883

Holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: A dominant photothermal ablative mechanism with chemical decomposition of urinary calculi.

K F Chan1, G J Vassar, T J Pfefer, J M Teichman, R D Glickman, S T Weintraub, A J Welch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Evidence is presented that the fragmentation process of long-pulse Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) lithotripsy is governed by photothermal decomposition of the calculi rather than photomechanical or photoacoustical mechanisms as is widely thought. The clinical Ho:YAG laser lithotriptor (2.12 microm, 250 micros) operates in the free-running mode, producing pulse durations much longer than the time required for a sound wave to propagate beyond the optical penetration depth of this wavelength in water. Hence, it is unlikely that shock waves are produced during bubble formation. In addition, the vapor bubble induced by this laser is not spherical. Thus the magnitude of the pressure wave produced at cavitation collapse does not contribute significantly to lithotripsy. STUDY DESIGN/
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fast-flash photography setup was used to capture the dynamics of urinary calculus fragmentation at various delay times following the onset of the Ho:YAG laser pulse. These images were concurrently correlated with pressure measurements obtained with a piezoelectric polyvinylidene-fluoride needle-hydrophone. Stone mass-loss measurements for ablation of urinary calculi (1) in air (dehydrated and hydrated) and in water, and (2) at pre-cooled and at room temperatures were compared. Chemical and composition analyses were performed on the ablation products of several types of Ho:YAG laser irradiated urinary calculi, including calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), calcium hydrogen phosphate dihydrate (CHPD), magnesium ammonium phosphate hexahydrate (MAPH), cystine, and uric acid calculi.
RESULTS: When the optical fiber was placed perpendicularly in contact with the surface of the target, fast-flash photography provided visual evidence that ablation occurred approximately 50 micros after the initiation of the Ho:YAG laser pulse (250-350 micros duration; 375-400 mJ per pulse), long before the collapse of the cavitation bubble. The measured peak acoustical pressure upon cavitation collapse was negligible (< 2 bars), indicating that photomechanical forces were not responsible for the observed fragmentation process. When the fiber was placed in parallel to the calculus surface, the pressure peaks occurring at the collapse of the cavitation were on the order of 20 bars, but no fragmentation occurred. Regardless of fiber orientation, no shock waves were recorded at the beginning of bubble formation. Ablation of COM calculi (a total of 150 J; 0.5 J per pulse at an 8-Hz repetition rate) revealed different Ho:YAG efficiencies for dehydrated calculus, hydrated calculus, and submerged calculus. COM and cystine calculi, pre-cooled at -80 degrees C and then placed in water, yielded lower mass-loss during ablation (20 J, 1.0 J per pulse) compared to the mass-loss of calculi at room temperature. Chemical analyses of the ablated calculi revealed products resulting from thermal decomposition. Calcium carbonate was found in samples composed of COM calculi; calcium pyrophosphate was found in CHPD samples; free sulfur and cysteine were discovered in samples composed of cystine samples; and cyanide was found in samples of uric acid calculi.
CONCLUSION: These experimental results provide convincing evidence that long-pulse Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy causes chemical decomposition of urinary calculi as a consequence of a dominant photothermal mechanism. Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10421883     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(1999)25:1<22::aid-lsm4>3.0.co;2-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  36 in total

1.  In vitro investigations of repulsion during laser lithotripsy using a pendulum set-up.

Authors:  Ronald Sroka; Nicolas Haseke; Thomas Pongratz; Volkmar Hecht; Derya Tilki; Christian G Stief; Markus Jürgen Bader
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  [Technical aspects of intraoperative assessment of treatment progress in laser lithotripsy].

Authors:  M Bader; V Hecht; Y Hocaoglu; M Staehler; O Reich; C Stief; R Sroka
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy in non-contact mode: optimization of fiber to stone working distance to improve ablation efficiency.

Authors:  Vincent De Coninck; Etienne Xavier Keller; Paul Chiron; Laurian Dragos; Esteban Emiliani; Steeve Doizi; Laurent Berthe; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Evaluation of dusting versus basketing - can new technologies improve stone-free rates?

Authors:  Brian Weiss; Ojas Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Optimizing use of the holmium:YAG laser for surgical management of urinary lithiasis.

Authors:  Abhishek P Patel; Bodo E Knudsen
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Laser applications in surgery.

Authors:  Beina Azadgoli; Regina Y Baker
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

7.  Temperature profiles of calyceal irrigation fluids during flexible ureteroscopic Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jingfei Teng; Yi Wang; Zhuomin Jia; Yawei Guan; Weiwei Fei; Xing Ai
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Intracorporeal lithotripsy.

Authors:  Peter Alken
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Thermal effects of Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy: real-time evaluation in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Simon Hein; Ralf Petzold; Martin Schoenthaler; Ulrich Wetterauer; Arkadiusz Miernik
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Update on ureteroscopy instrumentation.

Authors:  Renato N Pedro; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.