Literature DB >> 10421515

Effect of different barriers of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) on cecal and sidewall adhesions in the presence and absence of bleeding.

D M Wiseman1, L Gottlick-Iarkowski, L Kamp.   

Abstract

Adhesion formation after bowel surgery is a significant problem. The objective of this study was to evaluate two adhesion barriers composed of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC) in a model of bowel surgery, with and without bleeding. Ceca of female New Zealand White rabbits were abraded with gauze and a 3 x 5 cm patch of peritoneum and underlying muscle was excised from the right sidewall. Animals were randomized to receive no treatment, INTERCEED Barrier (Ethicon, Inc.), or neutralized INTERCEED (nTC7). ORC fabrics were applied to the excision site. Seven days later the percentage of the site and length of cecum with adhesions were estimated. The study was replicated in the presence of blood by nicking small vessels near the site sufficient to saturate the fabrics with blood. With hemostasis, the percentage of the sidewall with adhesions was reduced (p < .01) from 63.2 +/- 14.7% in controls (n = 6) to 4 +/- 2.7% with INTERCEED Barrier (n = 6) and 3 +/- 1.2% (n = 5) with nTC7. With bleeding, however, control (n = 5) levels of adhesions (67 +/- 17.5%) were reduced significantly with nTC7 (5.5 +/- 4%, n = 4; p < .01), but not INTERCEED Barrier (34.2 +/- 18.4%, n = 4). Similar trends were observed when the extent of adherent cecum was examined, since the cecum was the main site of adherence to the sidewall. However in the presence of blood, there was no effect of INTERCEED Barrier on cecal adhesions. We conclude that with hemostasis, both absorbable fabrics of ORC reduced adhesion formation between the injured cecum and abdominal sidewall. The effectiveness of INTERCEED Barrier, but not nTC7, was reduced but not eliminated in the presence of bleeding. This confirms similar observations in models of gynecologic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10421515     DOI: 10.1080/089419399272539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Surg        ISSN: 0894-1939            Impact factor:   2.533


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Development of a novel antiadhesive material, alginate flakes, ex vivo and in vivo.

Authors:  Yoshinori Hirasaki; Masaki Fukunaga; Akio Kidokoro; Ayumi Hashimoto; Tatsuo Nakamura; Hiroyuki Tsujimoto; Akeo Hagiwara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry.

Authors:  D Menzies; M Hidalgo Pascual; M K Walz; J J Duron; F Tonelli; A Crowe; A Knight
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Efficacy and safety of hyaluronate membrane in the rabbit cecum-abdominal wall adhesion model.

Authors:  Jae Young Kim; Wan Jin Cho; Jun Ho Kim; Sae Hwan Lim; Hyun Jung Kim; Young Woo Lee; Sung Won Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-07-25

5.  Prevention of postsurgery-induced abdominal adhesions by electrospun bioabsorbable nanofibrous poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based membranes.

Authors:  Xinhua Zong; Sean Li; Elliott Chen; Barbara Garlick; Kwang-Sok Kim; Dufei Fang; Jonathan Chiu; Thomas Zimmerman; Collin Brathwaite; Benjamin S Hsiao; Benjamin Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Experimental study evaluating the effect of a barrier method on postoperative intraabdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Axel Schneider; Joachim Bennek; Kasper Ø Olsen; Joachim Weiss; Wolfgang Schmidt; Udo Rolle
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  A prospective, randomised, controlled, double-blind phase I-II clinical trial on the safety of A-Part Gel as adhesion prophylaxis after major abdominal surgery versus non-treated group.

Authors:  Reinhold Lang; Petra Baumann; Karl-Walter Jauch; Claudia Schmoor; Christine Weis; Erich Odermatt; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  New hepatectomy-induced postoperative adhesion model in rats, and evaluation of the efficacy of anti-adhesion materials.

Authors:  Atsushi Shimizu; Takashi Suhara; Taichi Ito; Kiyohiko Omichi; Katsutoshi Naruse; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  In vivo performance of a bilayer wrap to prevent abdominal adhesions.

Authors:  Alysha Kishan; Taneidra Buie; Canaan Whitfield-Cargile; Anupriya Jose; Laura Bryan; Noah Cohen; Elizabeth Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Novel powdered anti-adhesion material: preventing postoperative intra-abdominal adhesions in a rat model.

Authors:  Katsunori Takagi; Masato Araki; Hidetoshi Fukuoka; Hiroaki Takeshita; Shigekazu Hidaka; Atsushi Nanashima; Terumitsu Sawai; Takeshi Nagayasu; Suong-Hyu Hyon; Naoki Nakajima
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.