Literature DB >> 10421275

Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on genetic testing for cystic fibrosis.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of the optimal practices for genetic testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). PARTICIPANTS: A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 14-member panel representing the fields of genetics, obstetrics, internal medicine, nursing, social work, epidemiology, pediatrics, psychiatry, genetic counseling, bioethics, health economics, health services research, law, and the public. In addition, 21 experts from these same fields presented data to the panel and a conference audience of 500. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched through MEDLINE, and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed its conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. Thereafter, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference.
CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing for CF should be offered to adults with a positive family history of CF, to partners of people with CF, to couples currently planning a pregnancy, and to couples seeking prenatal care. The panel does not recommend offering CF genetic testing to the general population or newborns. The panel advocates active research to develop improved treatments for people with CF and continued investigation into the understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease. Comprehensive educational programs targeted to health care professionals and the public should be developed using input from people living with CF and their families and from people from diverse racial and ethnic groups. Additionally, genetic counseling services must be accurate and provide balanced information to afford individuals the opportunity to make autonomous decisions. Every attempt should be made to protect individual rights, genetic and medical privacy rights, and to prevent discrimination and stigmatization. It is essential that the offering of CF carrier testing be phased in over a period to ensure that adequate education and appropriate genetic testing and counseling services are available to all persons being tested.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10421275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  21 in total

1.  Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making.

Authors:  Alison D Archibald; Belinda J McClaren
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-11-17

2.  Detection of an apparent homozygous 3120G>A cystic fibrosis mutation on a routine carrier screen.

Authors:  Denise LaMarche Heaney; Patrick Flume; Lauren Hamilton; Elaine Lyon; Daynna J Wolff
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Attitudes of potential providers towards preconceptional cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  Francis A M Poppelaars; Herman J Adèr; Martina C Cornel; Lidewij Henneman; Rosella P M G Hermens; Gerrit van der Wal; Leo P ten Kate
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Genetics and treatment options for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Celeste A Shelton; David C Whitcomb
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09

Review 6.  The measurement of patient attitudes regarding prenatal and preconception genetic carrier screening and translational behavioral medicine: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jennifer J Shiroff; Mathew J Gregoski
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Uptake of carrier testing in families after cystic fibrosis diagnosis through newborn screening.

Authors:  Belinda J McClaren; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Maryanne Aitken; R John Massie; Obioha C Ukoumunne; David J Amor
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Maternal knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Colleen Walsh Lang; Alex P Stark; Kruti Acharya; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 9.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a lesson in public health disparities.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.406

10.  Pregnancy as foreground in cystic fibrosis carrier testing decisions in primary care.

Authors:  Kathleen J H Sparbel; Janet K Williams
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.