Literature DB >> 10419357

Current use and timing of spinal surgery for management of acute spinal surgery for management of acute spinal cord injury in North America: results of a retrospective multicenter study.

C H Tator1, M G Fehlings, K Thorpe, W Taylor.   

Abstract

OBJECT: A multicenter retrospective study was performed in 36 North American centers to examine the use and timing of surgery in patients who have sustained acute spinal cord injury (SCI). The study was performed to obtain information required for the planning of a randomized controlled trial in which early and late decompressive surgery are compared.
METHODS: The records of all patients aged 16 to 75 years with acute SCI admitted to 36 centers within 24 hours of injury over a 9-month period in 1994 and 1995 were examined to obtain data on admission variables, methods of diagnosis, use of traction, and surgical variables including type and timing of surgery. A total of 585 patients with acute SCI or cauda equina injury were admitted to participating centers, although approximately half were ultimately excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria. Common causes for exclusion were late admission, age, gunshot wound, and absence of signs of compression on imaging studies. Thus, only approximately 50% of patients with acute SCI would be eligible for inclusion in a study of acute decompressive surgery. Although all patients underwent computerized tomography (CT) scanning, only 54% underwent magnetic resonance imaging, and CT myelography was performed in only 6%. Complete neurological injuries (American Spinal Injury Association Grade A) were present in 57.8%. Traction was applied in only 47% of patients who sustained cervical injury, in whom decompressive traction was successful in only 42% of cases. Neurological deterioration occurred in 8.1% of cases after traction. Surgery was performed in 65.4% of patients. The timing of surgery varied widely: less than 24 hours postinjury in 23.5%, between 25 and 48 hours postinjury in 15.8%, between 48 and 96 hours in 19%, and more than 5 days postinjury in 41.7% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that although surgery is commonly performed in patients with acute SCI, one third of cases are managed nonoperatively, and there is very little agreement on the optimum timing of surgical treatment. The results of this study confirm the need for a randomized controlled trial to assess the optimum timing of decompressive surgery in SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10419357     DOI: 10.3171/spi.1999.91.1.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  27 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord injury: a systematic review of current treatment options.

Authors:  David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Hemodynamic parameters and timing of surgical decompression in acute cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sagun Tuli; Jayshree Tuli; William P Coleman; Fred H Geisler; Andrei Krassioukov
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 4.  Timing of decompressive surgery of spinal cord after traumatic spinal cord injury: an evidence-based examination of pre-clinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Vanessa Noonan; David W Cadotte; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Emerging approaches to the surgical management of acute traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Jefferson R Wilson; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.620

7.  The use of classification and regression tree analysis to identify the optimal surgical timing for improving neurological outcomes following motor-complete thoracolumbar traumatic spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Julien Goulet; Andréane Richard-Denis; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  International Spinal Cord Injury: Spinal Interventions and Surgical Procedures Basic Data set.

Authors:  M F Dvorak; E Itshayek; M G Fehlings; A R Vaccaro; P C Wing; F Biering-Sorensen; V K Noonan
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury: A review of clinical evidence, animal model studies, and potential future directions of investigation.

Authors:  Yiping Li; Chandler L Walker; Yi Ping Zhang; Christopher B Shields; Xiao-Ming Xu
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2014-02-01

10.  The efficacy of surgical decompression before 24 hours versus 24 to 72 hours in patients with spinal cord injury from T1 to L1--with specific consideration on ethics: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Soheil Saadat; Alexander R Vaccaro; Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi; Mohammad Samadian; Arya Sheykhmozaffari; Seyed Mohammad Safdari; Bahram Keshmirian
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.