Literature DB >> 10418541

A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.

R J Volk1, A R Cass, S J Spann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a patient-educational approach to shared decision making for prostate cancer screening.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with preoffice visit assessment and 2-week follow-up.
SETTING: University-based family practice center. PATIENTS: Men aged 45 through 70 years with no history of prostate cancer or treatment for prostate disease (N = 160). Two patients were unavailable for follow-up. INTERVENTION: Twenty-minute educational videotape on advantages and disadvantages of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A measure of patients' core knowledge of prostate cancer developed for this study, reported preferences for PSA testing, and ratings of the videotape.
RESULTS: Patients' core knowledge at baseline was poor. At 2-week follow-up, subjects undergoing videotape intervention showed a 78% improvement in the number of knowledge questions answered correctly (P = .001), and knowledge increased about mortality due to early-stage prostate cancer, PSA screening performance, treatment-related complications, and disadvantages of screening. No overall change was observed for control subjects. At follow-up, 48 (62%) of 78 intervention patients planned to have the PSA test compared with 64 (80%) of 80 control patients (18.5% absolute reduction; 95% confidence interval, 4.6%-32.4%; P = .009). Intervention subjects rated favorably the amount of information provided and the clarity, balance, and length of the videotape and would recommend the videotape to others.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient education regarding the potential benefits and harms of early detection of prostate cancer can lead to more informed decision making. Incorporating the PSA videotape into the periodic health examination for asymptomatic men aged 50 years and older is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10418541     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.8.4.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  58 in total

1.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

2.  Screening for prostate cancer in the UK. Seems to be creeping in by the back door.

Authors:  J L Donovan; S J Frankel; D E Neal; F C Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

3.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

4.  Prostate cancer and race: variation in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Steven J Bernstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient education strategies in dermatology: part 2: methods.

Authors:  Matthew J Zirwas; Jessica L Holder
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2009-12

6.  Low-literacy interventions to promote discussion of prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Jyoti Sharma; Elizabeth Justice; Jeb Justice; Cynthia Spiker; Larry E Laufman; Megan Price; Armin D Weinberg; Terry A Jacobson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Assessment of the use and feasibility of video to supplement the genetic counseling process: a cancer genetic counseling perspective.

Authors:  J E Axilbund; L A Hamby; D B Thompson; S J Olsen; C A Griffin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Levi Ross; Alicestine D Ashford; Sherese J Bleechington; Tyra Dark; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences, and behaviors.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; David Nelson; David Radosevich; Sean Nugent; Ann B Flood; Nancy Dillon; Jeremy Holtzman; Michele Haas; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Determinants of colorectal cancer screening in primary care.

Authors:  Douglas M Post; Mira L Katz; Cathy Tatum; Stephanie L Dickinson; Stanley Lemeshow; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.