P Rogalla1, B Stöver, I Scheer, R Juran, G Gaedicke, B Hamm. 1. Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Charité Hospital, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Schumannstrasse 20/21, D-10 117 Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spiral CT of the chest is an imaging technique with unequivocal indications and proven higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional chest X-rays. However, particularly in children, attempts should be made to reduce radiation exposure to a minimum. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate whether a low-dose technique in spiral CT scanning results in adequate diagnostic information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 27 children (range 3 weeks to 14 years, mean 7 years) underwent a low-dose CT examination of the chest for various indications. The tube energy was 12.5 mAs (n = 5), 25 mAs (n = 17), 50 mAs (n = 3), or 75 mAs (n = 2) per slice. Two radiologists evaluated, in consensus, the CT scans with respect to their diagnostic value and comparison was made with 20 standard-dose chest CT examinations of adults (175 mAs per slice, mean age 56 years) with respect to technical image quality (noise and artefacts). In a second part of the study, dose measurements were carried out by means of exposing thermoluminescent dosimeters attached to a water/air phantom simulating a child's chest. RESULTS: All low-dose CT scans were of diagnostic image quality and no additional studies were necessary. The average image noise was significantly higher than in standard-dose CT examinations (SD 39.5 compared with 12.5 for unenhanced soft tissue, P < 0.01), but did not hinder accurate diagnosis. Artefacts were exclusively due to patient motion. Radiation exposure per slice was approx. 4 mGy at 25 mAs and 34 mGy at 250 mAs, regardless of slice thickness. CONCLUSIONS: For all indications in paediatric CT scanning of the chest, low-dose technique provides adequate image quality without loss of diagnostic information. The radiation exposure is approximately 5-20 % of a standard-dose CT.
BACKGROUND: Spiral CT of the chest is an imaging technique with unequivocal indications and proven higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional chest X-rays. However, particularly in children, attempts should be made to reduce radiation exposure to a minimum. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate whether a low-dose technique in spiral CT scanning results in adequate diagnostic information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 27 children (range 3 weeks to 14 years, mean 7 years) underwent a low-dose CT examination of the chest for various indications. The tube energy was 12.5 mAs (n = 5), 25 mAs (n = 17), 50 mAs (n = 3), or 75 mAs (n = 2) per slice. Two radiologists evaluated, in consensus, the CT scans with respect to their diagnostic value and comparison was made with 20 standard-dose chest CT examinations of adults (175 mAs per slice, mean age 56 years) with respect to technical image quality (noise and artefacts). In a second part of the study, dose measurements were carried out by means of exposing thermoluminescent dosimeters attached to a water/air phantom simulating a child's chest. RESULTS: All low-dose CT scans were of diagnostic image quality and no additional studies were necessary. The average image noise was significantly higher than in standard-dose CT examinations (SD 39.5 compared with 12.5 for unenhanced soft tissue, P < 0.01), but did not hinder accurate diagnosis. Artefacts were exclusively due to patient motion. Radiation exposure per slice was approx. 4 mGy at 25 mAs and 34 mGy at 250 mAs, regardless of slice thickness. CONCLUSIONS: For all indications in paediatric CT scanning of the chest, low-dose technique provides adequate image quality without loss of diagnostic information. The radiation exposure is approximately 5-20 % of a standard-dose CT.
Authors: Christoph M Heyer; Stefan P Lemburg; Thomas Kagel; Klaus-Michael Mueller; Thomas G Nuesslein; Christian H L Rieger; Volkmar Nicolas Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2005-01-26 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stella Joyce; Brian W Carey; Niamh Moore; David Mullane; Michael Moore; Mark F McEntee; Barry J Plant; Michael M Maher; Owen J O'Connor Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-03-20