Literature DB >> 10408548

Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).

H P Adams1, P H Davis, E C Leira, K C Chang, B H Bendixen, W R Clarke, R F Woolson, M D Hansen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score and the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) stroke subtype as predictors of outcomes at 7 days and 3 months after ischemic stroke.
METHODS: Using data collected from 1,281 patients enrolled in a clinical trial, subtype of stroke was categorized using the TOAST classification, and neurologic impairment at baseline was quantified using the NIHSS. Outcomes were assessed at 7 days and 3 months using the Barthel Index (BI) and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). An outcome was rated as excellent if the GOS score was 1 and the BI was 19 or 20 (scale of 0 to 20). Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, race, and history of previous stroke.
RESULTS: The baseline NIHSS score strongly predicted outcome, with one additional point on the NIHSS decreasing the likelihood of excellent outcomes at 7 days by 24% and at 3 months by 17%. At 3 months, excellent outcomes were noted in 46% of patients with NIHSS scores of 7 to 10 and in 23% of patients with scores of 11 to 15. After multivariate adjustment, lacunar stroke had an odds ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.5 to 6.4) for an excellent outcome at 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The NIHSS score strongly predicts the likelihood of a patient's recovery after stroke. A score of > or =16 forecasts a high probability of death or severe disability whereas a score of < or =6 forecasts a good recovery. Only the TOAST subtype of lacunar stroke predicts outcomes independent of the NIHSS score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10408548     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.53.1.126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  310 in total

1.  Truths about the NINDS study: setting the record straight.

Authors:  Jeffrey Mann
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2002-05

2.  Concurrent validity and reliability of retrospective scoring of the Pediatric National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

Authors:  Lauren A Beslow; Scott E Kasner; Sabrina E Smith; Michael T Mullen; Matthew P Kirschen; Rachel A Bastian; Michael M Dowling; Warren Lo; Lori C Jordan; Timothy J Bernard; Neil Friedman; Gabrielle DeVeber; Adam Kirton; Lisa Abraham; Daniel J Licht; Abbas F Jawad; Jonas H Ellenberg; Ebbing Lautenbach; Rebecca N Ichord
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  tPA for acute stroke: balancing baseline imbalances.

Authors:  Jeffrey Mann
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Not so accidental outcomes following cerebrovascular accidents.

Authors:  James F Meschia
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Clotting factors to treat thrombolysis-related symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Yazan J Alderazi; Niravkumar V Barot; Hui Peng; Farhaan S Vahidy; Digvijaya D Navalkele; Navdeep Sangha; Vivek Misra; Sean I Savitz
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Carotid artery stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and follow up.

Authors:  G Stankovic; F Liistro; S Moshiri; C Briguori; N Corvaja; G Gimelli; A Chieffo; M Montorfano; L Finci; V Spanos; C Di Mario; A Colombo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Distributional Validity and Prognostic Power of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in US Administrative Claims Data.

Authors:  Hamidreza Saber; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 18.302

Review 8.  Developing a Conversation Aid to Support Shared Decision Making: Reflections on Designing Anticoagulation Choice.

Authors:  Claudia L Zeballos-Palacios; Ian G Hargraves; Peter A Noseworthy; Megan E Branda; Marleen Kunneman; Bruce Burnett; Michael R Gionfriddo; Christopher J McLeod; Haeshik Gorr; Juan Pablo Brito; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Validity and reliability of a korean version of the national institutes of health stroke scale.

Authors:  Mi Sun Oh; Kyung-Ho Yu; Ju-Hun Lee; San Jung; Im-Suck Ko; Joon-Hyun Shin; Soo-Jin Cho; Hui-Chul Choi; Hyang Hee Kim; Byung-Chul Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 10.  Intra-arterial Stroke Management.

Authors:  Ethan A Prince; Sun Ho Ahn; Gregory M Soares
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.