Literature DB >> 10407709

Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?

A Bodiya1, D Vorias, H A Dickson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mammography is an important screening tool for the early detection of breast cancer. However, mammogram screening rates are low, despite interventions to improve them. We investigated two methods to improve mammogram screening and compared mammogram rates among women who received these interventions to mammogram screening rates in a control group. We also investigated the costs involved in these interventions.
METHODS: We studied mammogram screening rates of three randomized groups of women ages 50 and older from the Deighton Family Practice Center in Southfield, Mich. All women had had a mammogram 1 year previously and were due for another mammogram. Our control group (n = 110) received no intervention. The second group of women (n = 102) received a reminder letter from the radiology department. The third group (n = 86) received a reminder letter followed by a phone call from the physician's office staff if no mammogram had been obtained within 8 weeks after the due date for the mammogram. All three groups were monitored for 14 weeks after the due date to determine mammogram screening rates in each group.
RESULTS: A mammogram was obtained by 33% of women in group 1, 37% of women in group 2, and 57% of women in group 3. The mammogram screening rate of the third group was significantly greater than in the first two groups. In the third group, the additional cost added by the phone call intervention was $9 per mammogram obtained.
CONCLUSION: Mammogram screening rates are increased when patients are contacted by both a reminder letter and a phone call.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10407709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  9 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Deborah J del Junco
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Implementation Science Workshop: Barriers and Facilitators to Increasing Mammography Screening Rates in California's Public Hospitals.

Authors:  Cassidy Clarity; Gato Gourley; Courtney Lyles; Sara Ackerman; Margaret A Handley; Dean Schillinger; Urmimala Sarkar; Joseph Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Atti Le giornate della ricerca scientificae delle esperienze professionali dei giovani: Società Italiana di Igiene, Medicina Preventiva e Sanità Pubblica (SItI) Roma 20-21 dicembre 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2020-02-13

5.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

6.  Multilevel Predictors of Continued Adherence to Breast Cancer Screening Among Women Ages 50-74 Years in a Screening Population.

Authors:  Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; Anna N A Tosteson; Jennifer S Haas; Tracy Onega; Marilyn M Schapira; Anne Marie McCarthy; Christopher I Li; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Karen J Wernli; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Design and methods for a randomized clinical trial comparing three outreach efforts to improve screening mammography adherence.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Milagros C Rosal; Caroline Cranos; George Reed; Robin Clark; Susan Sama; Robert Yood
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Effectiveness of a combined strategy to improve therapeutic compliance and degree of control among patients with hypercholesterolaemia: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Ignacio Párraga-Martínez; Joseba Rabanales-Sotos; Fernando Lago-Deibe; Juan M Téllez-Lapeira; Francisco Escobar-Rabadán; Alejandro Villena-Ferrer; Mariano Blasco-Valle; José M Ferreras-Amez; Susana Morena-Rayo; José M del Campo-del Campo; Maria Candelaria Ayuso-Raya; José J Pérez-Pascual
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura Camilloni; Eliana Ferroni; Beatriz Jimenez Cendales; Annamaria Pezzarossi; Giacomo Furnari; Piero Borgia; Gabriella Guasticchi; Paolo Giorgi Rossi
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.