Literature DB >> 10407202

Human face perception traced by magneto- and electro-encephalography.

S Watanabe1, R Kakigi, S Koyama, E Kirino.   

Abstract

The temporal and spatial processing of face perception in normal subjects was traced by magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). We used 5 different visual stimuli: (1) face with opened eyes, (2) face with closed eyes, (3) eyes, (4) scrambled face, and (5) hand, and they were shown in random order. Subjects were asked to count the number of hand stimuli. To analyze the complicated brain responses to visual stimuli, we used brain electric source analysis (BESA) as the spatio-temporal multiple source model. In MEG recording, the 1M and 2M components were identified in all subjects. The 1M component was recorded to all kinds of stimuli. The 2M component was clearly identified only to face stimulation in all subjects, but to eyes stimulation in only 3 subjects with a small amplitude. The 2M component was not identified to scrambled face nor hand stimulation. The 2M component was recorded from the right hemisphere in all subjects, but in only 5 of 10 subjects from the left hemisphere. The mean peak latencies of the 1M and 2M components were approximately 132 and 179 ms, respectively. The interpeak latency between 1M and 2M was approximately 47 ms on average but the interindividual difference was large. There was no significant difference of the 2M latency between face with opened eyes and face with closed eyes. The 1M component was generated in the primary visual cortex in the bilateral hemispheres, and the 2M component was generated in the inferior temporal cortex, around the fusiform gyrus. In the EEG recording, face-specific components, positive at the vertex, P200 (Cz), and the negative at the temporal areas, N190 (T5') and N190 (T6'), were clearly recorded. The EEG results were fundamentally compatible with the MEG results. The amplitude of the component recorded from the right hemisphere was significantly larger than that from the left hemisphere. These findings suggest that the fusiform gyrus is considered to play an important role in face perception in humans, and that the right hemisphere is more dominant. Face perception takes place approximately 47 ms after the primary response to visual stimulation in the primary visual cortex, but the period of information transfer to the fusiform gyrus is variable among subjects. Detailed temporal and spatial analyses of the processing of face perception can be achieved with MEG. Copyright 1999 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10407202     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00013-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  23 in total

1.  When do infants differentiate profile face from frontal face? A near-infrared spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Emi Nakato; Yumiko Otsuka; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Shoko Watanabe; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Functional and structural deficits in brain regions subserving face perception in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Toshiaki Onitsuka; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Kevin M Spencer; Melissa Frumin; Noriomi Kuroki; Lisa C Lucia; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 18.112

3.  Differential priming effects of color-opponent subliminal stimulation on visual magnetic responses.

Authors:  Minoru Hoshiyama; Ryusuke Kakigi; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Early dissociation of face and object processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Elina Pihko; Jussi Nurminen; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Effect of configural distortion on a face-related ERP evoked by random dots blinking.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Mika Teruya; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Face activated neurodynamic cortical networks.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Doug Ranken; Selma Supek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  The fusiform response to faces: explicit versus implicit processing of emotion.

Authors:  Justin F Monroe; Mark Griffin; Amy Pinkham; James Loughead; Ruben C Gur; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Abraham Goldstein; Yuval Harpaz; Myriam Hansel; Elana Zion-Golumbic; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Facial Cosmetics Exert a Greater Influence on Processing of the Mouth Relative to the Eyes: Evidence from the N170 Event-Related Potential Component.

Authors:  Hideaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-05

Review 10.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: the core of social cognition.

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Magali Batty
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.