BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether the measurement of HBV DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is helpful in monitoring response to interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis B virus infection, we have determined sequentially serum levels of HBV DNA during and up to 18 months after treatment, in 10 patients with a sustained response (all anti-HBe positive, five also HBsAg negative and anti-HBs positive) and, as controls, in 12 non-responders. METHODS: Serum HBV DNA was measured by standard hybrisation assay (Genostics, Abbott) and by quantitative PCR (Amplicor HBV Monitor test, Roche Diagnostic Systems). RESULTS: A clear difference in HBV viral load between responders and non-responders was observed from the fourth week of treatment and was maintained throughout the study period. At the last follow up 16-26 (median 21) months after starting treatment, all the 10 responders were HBV DNA negative by hybridisation. By PCR, however, five (one anti-HBs and four anti-HBe positive) were still HBV DNA positive. In addition, one anti-HBs positive patient HBV DNA negative by PCR at last follow up, had fluctuating levels of HBV DNA by PCR during the observation period, only intermittently falling below the threshold of the assay. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of HBV DNA by quantitative PCR provides early prediction of response to interferon, allowing prompt modification of treatment. With this technique, HBV DNA is detected in a high proportion of sustained responders, suggesting that HBV may never be completely eliminated by interferon treatment, even after anti-HBs seroconversion.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether the measurement of HBV DNA by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is helpful in monitoring response to interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis B virus infection, we have determined sequentially serum levels of HBV DNA during and up to 18 months after treatment, in 10 patients with a sustained response (all anti-HBe positive, five also HBsAg negative and anti-HBs positive) and, as controls, in 12 non-responders. METHODS: Serum HBV DNA was measured by standard hybrisation assay (Genostics, Abbott) and by quantitative PCR (Amplicor HBV Monitor test, Roche Diagnostic Systems). RESULTS: A clear difference in HBV viral load between responders and non-responders was observed from the fourth week of treatment and was maintained throughout the study period. At the last follow up 16-26 (median 21) months after starting treatment, all the 10 responders were HBV DNA negative by hybridisation. By PCR, however, five (one anti-HBs and four anti-HBe positive) were still HBV DNA positive. In addition, one anti-HBs positive patient HBV DNA negative by PCR at last follow up, had fluctuating levels of HBV DNA by PCR during the observation period, only intermittently falling below the threshold of the assay. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of HBV DNA by quantitative PCR provides early prediction of response to interferon, allowing prompt modification of treatment. With this technique, HBV DNA is detected in a high proportion of sustained responders, suggesting that HBV may never be completely eliminated by interferon treatment, even after anti-HBs seroconversion.