Literature DB >> 10405679

Estimates of animal and plant protein intake in US adults: results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991.

E Smit1, F J Nieto, C J Crespo, P Mitchell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the sources of protein intake in a sample of the US adult population and among subgroups defined by race-ethnicity, age, and gender.
DESIGN: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991, is a stratified random sample of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population, drawn from the 50 United States and the District of Columbia. For all foods consumed by the participants, based on a 24-hour dietary recall, protein sources and the contribution of each protein type to the total protein intake were determined.
SUBJECTS: Adult participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n = 7,924). STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Weighted total, age-specific, and age-adjusted mean protein intakes were calculated using SAS and WesVarPC. Statistical differences were determined by 2-tailed t tests.
RESULTS: The main protein source in the American diet is animal protein (69%). Meat, fish, and poultry protein combined contributed the most to animal protein (42%), followed by dairy protein (20%). Grains (18%) contributed the most to plant protein consumption. Women consumed a lower percentage of beef (14%) and pork (7%) protein than did men (18% and 9%, respectively). Women also consumed a higher percentage of poultry (13%), dairy (22%), and fruit and vegetable (11%) protein than did men (11%, 19%, and 9%, respectively). Blacks reported eating a higher percentage of poultry (18%) and pork (11%) protein and a lower percent of dairy protein (14%) than did whites (12%, 7%, and 22%, respectively) and Mexican-Americans (11%, 8%, and 17%, respectively). Mexican-Americans consumed a higher percentage of legume (7%) and egg (7%) protein than did whites (4% and 4%, respectively) and blacks (4% and 5%, respectively). Whites consumed a higher percentage of grain protein (19%) than did blacks (16%) and Mexican-Americans (15%).
CONCLUSIONS: These results show that, although the percentage of total energy from protein may be similar among race-ethnicities and between men and women, their sources of protein are different. These differences should be taken into account when providing nutrition education for specific populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10405679     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00193-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  36 in total

1.  Self-reported differences in daily raw vegetable intake by ethnicity in a breast screening program.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Catherine B Barden; Bettina Beech; Kelly Fay; Maureen Sintich; Derrick J Beech
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 2.  Plant protein and animal proteins: do they differentially affect cardiovascular disease risk?

Authors:  Chesney K Richter; Ann C Skulas-Ray; Catherine M Champagne; Penny M Kris-Etherton
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Dietary acid load: a novel nutritional target in chronic kidney disease?

Authors:  Julia J Scialla; Cheryl A M Anderson
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.620

4.  Plant- and animal-protein diets in relation to sociodemographic drivers, quality, and cost: findings from the Seattle Obesity Study.

Authors:  Anju Aggarwal; Adam Drewnowski
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Food Revolution.

Authors:  Christopher D Gardner; Michelle E Hauser
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2017-03-08

6.  Antihypertensive effects of dietary protein and its mechanism.

Authors:  Sudesh Vasdev; Jennifer Stuckless
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2010

7.  Estimated net endogenous acid production and serum bicarbonate in African Americans with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Julia J Scialla; Lawrence J Appel; Brad C Astor; Edgar R Miller; Srinivasan Beddhu; Mark Woodward; Rulan S Parekh; Cheryl A M Anderson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Adolescents perceive a low added sugar adequate fiber diet to be more satiating and equally palatable compared to a high added sugar low fiber diet in a randomized-crossover design controlled feeding pilot trial.

Authors:  Tanya M Halliday; Sarah V Liu; Lori B Moore; Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2018-05-05

9.  The role of the renal ammonia transporter Rhcg in metabolic responses to dietary protein.

Authors:  Lisa Bounoure; Davide Ruffoni; Ralph Müller; Gisela Anna Kuhn; Soline Bourgeois; Olivier Devuyst; Carsten A Wagner
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Dietary protein safety and resistance exercise: what do we really know?

Authors:  Lonnie M Lowery; Lorena Devia
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.