OBJECTIVE:Pediatric burn patients often exhibit acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms. Information on psychopharmacological treatment of ASD symptoms in children is scarce. This pilot study used a prospective, randomized, double-blind design to test whether thermally injured children suffering ASD symptoms benefit fromimipramine. METHOD: Twenty-five children, aged 2 to 19 years, received either imipramine or chloral hydrate for 7 days. A structured interview (clinically useful, but validity and reliability not yet established) was used to assess the presence and frequency of ASD symptoms both before treatment and 3 times during the treatment period. RESULTS:Eleven females and 14 males participated, with a mean total burn surface area of 45% (SD = 23%) and mean age of 8 years (SD = 6). Imipramine was more effective than chloral hydrate in treating ASD symptoms (chi 2 [1, N = 25] = 5.24, p < .02). Five of 13 were positive responders to chloral hydrate (38%). Ten of 12 were positive responders to low-dose imipramine (83%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests a place for cautious initial use of imipramine to reduce ASD symptoms in burned children. Care must be taken to minimize cardiovascular risks in an off-label application of imipramine in children, especially those receiving additional medications.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric burn patients often exhibit acute stress disorder (ASD) symptoms. Information on psychopharmacological treatment of ASD symptoms in children is scarce. This pilot study used a prospective, randomized, double-blind design to test whether thermally injured children suffering ASD symptoms benefit from imipramine. METHOD: Twenty-five children, aged 2 to 19 years, received either imipramine or chloral hydrate for 7 days. A structured interview (clinically useful, but validity and reliability not yet established) was used to assess the presence and frequency of ASD symptoms both before treatment and 3 times during the treatment period. RESULTS: Eleven females and 14 males participated, with a mean total burn surface area of 45% (SD = 23%) and mean age of 8 years (SD = 6). Imipramine was more effective than chloral hydrate in treating ASD symptoms (chi 2 [1, N = 25] = 5.24, p < .02). Five of 13 were positive responders to chloral hydrate (38%). Ten of 12 were positive responders to low-dose imipramine (83%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study suggests a place for cautious initial use of imipramine to reduce ASD symptoms in burned children. Care must be taken to minimize cardiovascular risks in an off-label application of imipramine in children, especially those receiving additional medications.