Literature DB >> 10401898

Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies.

J C Eck1, S C Humphreys, S D Hodges.   

Abstract

Lumbar fusion is commonly performed to relieve pain from degenerative conditions, including spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis. While clinical studies have reported favorable fusion rates with limited complications, few have investigated the effect of fusion on the adjacent motion segment. A solid fusion alters the biomechanics at the adjacent level, resulting in increased mechanical demands. There have been reports of increased rates of adjacent-level pathologic lesions after fusion, but these have not accounted for the natural history of degenerative changes. Biomechanical and radiographic studies have shown increased forces, mobility, and intradiscal pressure in adjacent segments after fusion. It has been hypothesized that these changes lead to an acceleration in pathologic changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10401898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  33 in total

1.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The effect of design parameters of dynamic pedicle screw systems on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C Schilling; S Krüger; T M Grupp; G N Duda; W Blömer; A Rohlmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical characterization of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Christina A Niosi; Qingan A Zhu; Derek C Wilson; Ory Keynan; David R Wilson; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Reliability of motion measurements after total disc replacement: the spike and the fin method.

Authors:  Balkan Cakir; Marcus Richter; Wolfhart Puhl; René Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Adjacent segment instability after treatment with a Graf ligament at minimum 8 years' followup.

Authors:  Yongsoo Choi; Kisoo Kim; Kwangyoung So
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration.

Authors:  Per Ekman; Hans Möller; Adel Shalabi; Yiang Xiao Yu; Rune Hedlund
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.

Authors:  Philippe Gédet; Daniel Haschtmann; Paul A Thistlethwaite; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Biomechanical analysis and design of a dynamic spinal fixator using topology optimization: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hung-Ming Lin; Chien-Lin Liu; Yung-Ning Pan; Chang-Hung Huang; Shih-Liang Shih; Shun-Hwa Wei; Chen-Sheng Chen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Seven years follow-up for total lumbar facet joint replacement (TOPS) in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Yoram Anekstein; Yizhar Floman; Yossi Smorgick; Nahshon Rand; Michael Millgram; Yigal Mirovsky
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.