J Tsevat1, U R Kotagal. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Ohio 45267-0535, USA. joel.tsevat@uc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment management strategies for children older than 3 years who present with signs or symptoms of pharyngitis. DESIGN: Decision model with 7 strategies, including neither testing for streptococcus nor treating with antibiotics; treating empirically with penicillin V; basing treatment on results of a throat culture (Culture); and basing treatment on results of enzyme immunoassay or optical immunoassay rapid tests, performed alone or in combination with throat cultures. In these 7 strategies, all tests are performed in a local reference laboratory. In a sensitivity analysis, we examined the cost-effectiveness of 4 strategies involving office-based testing. We obtained data on event probabilities and test characteristics from our hospital's clinical laboratory and the literature; costs for the analysis were based on resource use. RESULTS: At a baseline prevalence of 20.8% for streptococcal pharyngitis, the Culture strategy was the least expensive and most effective, with an average cost of $6.85 per patient. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence of streptococcal pharyngitis, the rheumatic fever attack rate, the cost of the enzyme immunoassay test, and the cost of culturing and reporting culture results. The Culture strategy was also preferred if amoxicillin was substituted for oral penicillin. For office-based testing, Culture was the least costly strategy, but treatment based on results of the optical immunoassay test alone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.6 million per additional life saved. CONCLUSION: In a setting with adherent patients, children with sore throats should generally get throat cultures in lieu of rapid streptococcus antigen tests.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment management strategies for children older than 3 years who present with signs or symptoms of pharyngitis. DESIGN: Decision model with 7 strategies, including neither testing for streptococcus nor treating with antibiotics; treating empirically with penicillin V; basing treatment on results of a throat culture (Culture); and basing treatment on results of enzyme immunoassay or optical immunoassay rapid tests, performed alone or in combination with throat cultures. In these 7 strategies, all tests are performed in a local reference laboratory. In a sensitivity analysis, we examined the cost-effectiveness of 4 strategies involving office-based testing. We obtained data on event probabilities and test characteristics from our hospital's clinical laboratory and the literature; costs for the analysis were based on resource use. RESULTS: At a baseline prevalence of 20.8% for streptococcal pharyngitis, the Culture strategy was the least expensive and most effective, with an average cost of $6.85 per patient. The outcome was sensitive to the prevalence of streptococcal pharyngitis, the rheumatic fever attack rate, the cost of the enzyme immunoassay test, and the cost of culturing and reporting culture results. The Culture strategy was also preferred if amoxicillin was substituted for oral penicillin. For office-based testing, Culture was the least costly strategy, but treatment based on results of the optical immunoassay test alone had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $1.6 million per additional life saved. CONCLUSION: In a setting with adherent patients, children with sore throats should generally get throat cultures in lieu of rapid streptococcus antigen tests.
Authors: Hannah Fraser; Daniel Gallacher; Felix Achana; Rachel Court; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Chidozie Nduka; Chris Stinton; Rebecca Willans; Paramjit Gill; Hema Mistry Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Carolina Giraldez-Garcia; Beltran Rubio; Jose F Gallegos-Braun; Iñaki Imaz; Jesus Gonzalez-Enriquez; Antonio Sarria-Santamera Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Neil W Anderson; Blake W Buchan; Donna Mayne; Joel E Mortensen; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Nathan A Ledeboer Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: JaBaris D Swain; Daniel N Pugliese; Joseph Mucumbitsi; Emmanuel K Rusingiza; Nathan Ruhamya; Abel Kagame; Gapira Ganza; Patricia C Come; Suellen Breakey; Bonnie Greenwood; Jochen D Muehlschlegel; Cecilia Patton-Bolman; Agnes Binagwaho; R Morton Bolman Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Aurelino Rocha Barbosa Júnior; Cláudia Di Lorenzo Oliveira; Maria Jussara Fernandes Fontes; Laura Maria de Lima Bezário Facury Lasmar; Paulo Augusto Moreira Camargos Journal: Rev Paul Pediatr Date: 2014-12
Authors: C Ochoa Sangrador; M Vilela Fernández; M Cueto Baelo; J M Eiros Bouza; L Inglada Galiana Journal: An Pediatr (Barc) Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 1.500