Literature DB >> 10401639

Hippocampal place cells can develop distinct representations of two visually identical environments.

H Tanila1.   

Abstract

The pattern separation ability of hippocampal place cells was tested in an environment in which two visually identical rectangular compartments (Box A and Box B) were connected by a hidden door. Small ensembles of neurons were recorded with tetrodes while the rat searched for randomly distributed loci for reinforcing brain stimulation. The first recording session in Box A was conducted after the rat had explored the environment for the first time for 30 min. Immediately thereafter, a hidden door between Box A and Box B was opened to let the rat into the unexplored compartment, and a 5-min recording session was run with the door concealed. A rearrangement of place fields in Box B was observed in 18/20 neurons and in 5/6 ensembles. Most place fields did not change between two successive sessions in Box B. When the rat returned to Box A, the ensembles of neurons were as likely to adopt the original Box A firing field pattern as the more recent Box B pattern. In order to control for the influence of extra-arena cues, the rat was gradually lifted in a closed bucket from Box A into Box B while the whole arena was rotated by 90 degrees. All but one neuron and all the ensembles followed the intra-arena cues. Both rotated Box B and Box A firing field patterns were represented but Box B pattern was stronger among the neuronal ensembles. These findings indicate that hippocampal place cells not only can develop distinct representations of two visually identical environments but also can selectively reactivate either one of these representations depending on the rat's recent experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10401639     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:3<235::AID-HIPO4>3.0.CO;2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  22 in total

1.  Accumulation of hippocampal place fields at the goal location in an annular watermaze task.

Authors:  S A Hollup; S Molden; J G Donnett; M B Moser; E I Moser
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Hippocampus is required for paired associate memory with neither delay nor trial uniqueness.

Authors:  Jinah Yoon; Yeran Seo; Jangjin Kim; Inah Lee
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: a model of the hippocampal system.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; James L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  Timing and efficacy of transmitter release at mossy fiber synapses in the hippocampal network.

Authors:  Josef Bischofberger; Dominique Engel; Michael Frotscher; Peter Jonas
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Disconnection analysis of CA3 and DG in mediating encoding but not retrieval in a spatial maze learning task.

Authors:  Taylor Jerman; Raymond P Kesner; Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Activity dynamics and behavioral correlates of CA3 and CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons.

Authors:  Kenji Mizuseki; Sebastien Royer; Kamran Diba; György Buzsáki
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 7.  Field repetition and local mapping in the hippocampus and the medial entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Roddy M Grieves; Éléonore Duvelle; Emma R Wood; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Selective lesions of the dentate gyrus produce disruptions in place learning for adjacent spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrea M Morris; John C Churchwell; Raymond P Kesner; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Recognition memory for complex visual discriminations is influenced by stimulus interference in rodents with perirhinal cortex damage.

Authors:  Paul E Gilbert; Raymond P Kesner
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Age-related changes in place learning for adjacent and separate locations.

Authors:  Enrique I Gracian; Laura E Shelley; Andrea M Morris; Paul E Gilbert
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.