Literature DB >> 10397121

The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography.

J Yee1, R K Hung, G A Akerkar, S D Wall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare colonic distention with and without glucagon hydrochloride during CT colonography. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CT colonography using single breath-hold, thin-section helical technique was performed on 60 patients who were in the supine and prone positions. Magnesium citrate and polyethylene glycol were used for bowel preparation. Colonic air insufflation averaged 30 bulb compressions. Thirty-three patients received IV glucagon (1 mg), and 27 patients did not. The colon was divided into eight segments, and the adequacy of the distention of each segment was evaluated. Overall colonic distention scores, defined as the number of inadequately distended segments (0-8), were recorded for the supine, prone, and combined positions. In the combined position, inadequate distention was defined as identical segments that were inadequately distended in both positions.
RESULTS: A total of 960 segments were evaluated: 528 segments in the glucagon group and 432 segments in the nonglucagon group. In the glucagon group, 444 segments (84.1%) were adequately distended. In the nonglucagon group, 365 segments (84.5%) were adequately distended. The median and range for overall colonic distention scores in the supine, prone, and combined positions were 1 (0-3), 1 (0-3), and 0 (0), respectively, for the glucagon group and 1 (0-6), 1 (0-6), and 0 (0-1), respectively, for the nonglucagon group. We found no statistically significant difference in overall colonic distention between the glucagon group and the nonglucagon group for the supine (p = .84), prone (p = .15), or combined (p = .28) positions.
CONCLUSION: Glucagon administration before CT colonography does not improve colonic distention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10397121     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.173.1.10397121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

Review 1.  Trends in CT colonography.

Authors:  J F Bruzzi; D D Brennan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2013-02

3.  [CT colonography: patient preparation and examination technique].

Authors:  P Lefere; S Gryspeerdt; T Mang
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  CT colonography in cancer detection: methods and results.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Thomas Mang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography.

Authors:  John F Bruzzi; Alan C Moss; Darren D Brennan; Padraic MacMathuna; Helen M Fenlon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  CT colonography can be an adjunct to optical colonoscopy in CRC screening.

Authors:  Vivek V Gumaste
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Temporal and multiinstitutional quality assessment of CT colonography.

Authors:  Robert L Van Uitert; Ronald M Summers; Jacob M White; Keshav K Deshpande; J Richard Choi; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography.

Authors:  Stefaan S Gryspeerdt; Murielle J Herman; Marc A Baekelandt; Bartel G van Holsbeeck; Philippe A Lefere
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Advances in CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Stefanie Weinstein; Tara Morgan; Patrick Alore; Rizwan Aslam
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Comparison of 64-Detector CT Colonography and Conventional Colonoscopy in the Detection of Colorectal Lesions.

Authors:  Cigdem Devir; Mahmut Kebapci; Tuncer Temel; Aysegul Ozakyol
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 0.212

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.