Literature DB >> 10396843

Computer modelling of the cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics of aqueduct stenosis.

E E Jacobson1, D F Fletcher, M K Morgan, I H Johnston.   

Abstract

As the craniospinal space is a pressure loaded system it is difficult to conceptualize and understand the flow dynamics through the ventricular system. Aqueduct stenosis compromises flow, increasing the pressure required to move cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the ventricles. Under normal circumstances, less than one pascal (1 Pa) of pressure is required to move a physiological flow of CSF through the aqueduct. This is too small to measure using clinical pressure transducers. A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) program, CFX, has been used to model two forms of aqueduct stenosis: simple narrowing and forking of the aqueduct. This study shows that with mild stenoses, the increase in pressure required to drive flow becomes significant (86-125 Pa), which may result in an increased transmantle pressure difference but not necessarily an increased intraventricular pressure. Severe stenoses will result in both. Wall shear stresses increase concomitantly and may contribute to local damage of the aqueduct wall and further gliosis with narrowing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10396843     DOI: 10.1007/bf02513267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  14 in total

1.  Atresia and stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius with comments on the Arnold-Chiari complex.

Authors:  B W LICHTENSTEIN
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  1959-01       Impact factor: 3.685

2.  Interstitial pressure, volume, and flow during infusion into brain tissue.

Authors:  P J Basser
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.514

Review 3.  Mechanical properties of tissues of the nervous system.

Authors:  A K Ommaya
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Developmental stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius.

Authors:  R S BECKETT; M G NETSKY; H M ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1950-09       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Fluid dynamics of the cerebral aqueduct.

Authors:  E E Jacobson; D F Fletcher; M K Morgan; I H Johnston
Journal:  Pediatr Neurosurg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.162

6.  Transcerebral mantle pressure in normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  J Hoff; R Barber
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1974-08

7.  Atresia of the foramina of Luschka and Magendie: the Dandy-Walker cyst.

Authors:  A J Raimondi; G Samuelson; L Yarzagaray; T Norton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 5.115

8.  Is aqueduct stenosis a result of hydrocephalus?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Hydrocephalus with cerebral aqueductal dysgenesis and craniofacial anomalies.

Authors:  D W Baker; H V Vinters
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Experimental normal-pressure hydrocephalus is accompanied by increased transmantle pressure.

Authors:  E S Conner; L Foley; P M Black
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  9 in total

1.  A computational study on the biomechanical factors related to stent-graft models in the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  S K Lam; George S K Fung; Stephen W K Cheng; K W Chow
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cinalli; Pietro Spennato; Anna Nastro; Ferdinando Aliberti; Vincenzo Trischitta; Claudio Ruggiero; Giuseppe Mirone; Emilio Cianciulli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Three-dimensional computational prediction of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human brain.

Authors:  Brian Sweetman; Michalis Xenos; Laura Zitella; Andreas A Linninger
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Transmantle Pressure Computed from MR Imaging Measurements of Aqueduct Flow and Dimensions.

Authors:  S J Sincomb; W Coenen; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; M Borzage; V Haughton; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 4.966

5.  Aqueductal stenosis 9 years after mumps meningoencephalitis: treatment by endoscopic third ventriculostomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Cinalli; Pietro Spennato; Claudio Ruggiero; Ferdinando Aliberti; Giuseppe Maggi
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Split cerebral aqueduct: a neuroendoscopic illustration.

Authors:  Alberto Feletti; Alessandro Fiorindi; Pierluigi Longatti
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Exploring the efficacy of endoscopic ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus treatment via a multicompartmental poroelastic model of CSF transport: a computational perspective.

Authors:  John C Vardakis; Brett J Tully; Yiannis Ventikos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Respiratory influence on cerebrospinal fluid flow - a computational study based on long-term intracranial pressure measurements.

Authors:  Vegard Vinje; Geir Ringstad; Erika Kristina Lindstrøm; Lars Magnus Valnes; Marie E Rognes; Per Kristian Eide; Kent-Andre Mardal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Boundary conditions investigation to improve computer simulation of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in hydrocephalus patients.

Authors:  Seifollah Gholampour; Nasser Fatouraee
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.