Literature DB >> 10395140

Attributable morbidity and mortality of catheter-related septicemia in critically ill patients: a matched, risk-adjusted, cohort study.

L Soufir1, J F Timsit, C Mahe, J Carlet, B Regnier, S Chevret.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the attributable risk of death due to catheter-related septicemia (CRS) in critically ill patients when taking into account severity of illness during the intensive-care unit (ICU) stay but before CRS.
DESIGN: Pairwise-matched (1:2) exposed-unexposed study.
SETTING: 10-bed medical-surgical ICU and an 18-bed medical ICU. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to either ICU between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1995, were eligible. Exposed patients were defined as patients with CRS; unexposed controls were selected according to matching variables.
METHODS: Matching variables were diagnosis at ICU admission, length of central catheterization before the infection, McCabe Score, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS) II at admission, age, and gender. Severity scores (SAPS II, Organ System Failure Score, Organ Dysfunction and Infection Score, and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System) were calculated four times for each patient: the day of ICU admission, the day of CRS onset, and 3 and 7 days before CRS. Matching was successful for 38 exposed patients. Statistical analysis was based on nonparametric tests for epidemiological data and on Cox's models for the exposed-unexposed study, with adjustment on matching variables and prognostic factors of mortality.
RESULTS: CRS complicated 1.17 per 100 ICU admissions during the study period. Twenty (53%) of the CRS cases were associated with septic shock. CRS was associated with a 28% increase in SAPS II. Crude ICU mortality rates from exposed and unexposed patients were 50% and 21%, respectively. CRS remained associated with mortality even when adjusted on other prognostic factors at ICU admission (relative risk [RR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.08-3.73; P=.03). However, after adjustment on severity scores calculated between ICU admission and 1 week before CRS, the increased mortality was no longer significant (RR, 1.41; CI95, 0.76-2.61; P=.27).
CONCLUSION: CRS is associated with subsequent morbidity and mortality in the ICU, even when adjusted on severity factors at ICU admission. However, after adjustment on severity factors during the ICU stay and before the event, there was only a trend toward CRS-attributable mortality. The evolution of patient severity should be taken into account when evaluating excess mortality induced by nosocomial events in ICU patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10395140     DOI: 10.1086/501639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  42 in total

Review 1.  Logistic or Cox model to identify risk factors of nosocomial infection: still a controversial issue.

Authors:  S Chevret
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Bloodstream infections in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Alessia Carnelutti
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.882

3.  ICU-acquired infections and sepsis: more of a deadly duo.

Authors:  Christian Brun-Buisson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Defining, treating and preventing hospital acquired pneumonia: European perspective.

Authors:  Antoni Torres; Santiago Ewig; Harmut Lode; Jean Carlet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Colonization of the medial lumen is a risk factor for catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Authors:  Josep-Maria Sirvent; Loreto Vidaur; María García; Patricia Ortiz; Jordi de Batlle; Montserrat Motjé; Alfons Bonet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-06-29       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  [Surveillance of nosocomial infections in intensive care units. Current data and interpretations].

Authors:  Petra Gastmeier; Christine Geffers; Dorit Sohr; Frank Schwab; Michael Behnke; Henning Rüden
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2003-02-28       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Disease progression in hemodynamically stable patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis.

Authors:  Seth W Glickman; Charles B Cairns; Ronny M Otero; Christopher W Woods; Ephraim L Tsalik; Raymond J Langley; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Lawrence P Park; Lawrence T Glickman; Vance G Fowler; Stephen F Kingsmore; Emanuel P Rivers
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 8.  A state of the art review on optimal practices to prevent, recognize, and manage complications associated with intravascular devices in the critically ill.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Mark Rupp; Emilio Bouza; Vineet Chopra; Tarja Kärpänen; Kevin Laupland; Thiago Lisboa; Leonard Mermel; Olivier Mimoz; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Garyphalia Poulakou; Bertrand Souweine; Walter Zingg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Effects of rapid detection of bloodstream infections on length of hospitalization and hospital charges.

Authors:  S E Beekmann; D J Diekema; K C Chapin; G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Benefits of minocycline and rifampin-impregnated central venous catheters. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trial.

Authors:  Cristóbal León; Sergio Ruiz-Santana; Jordi Rello; Maria V de la Torre; Jordi Vallés; Francisco Alvarez-Lerma; Rafael Sierra; Pedro Saavedra; Francisco Alvarez-Salgado
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.