BACKGROUND: Aggressive diagnosis and treatment of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock has been shown to reduce mortality. To enhance the ability to intervene in patients with lesser illness severity, a better understanding of the natural history of the early progression from simple infection to more severe illness is needed. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to 1) describe the clinical presentation of ED sepsis, including types of infection and causative microorganisms, and 2) determine the incidence, patient characteristics, and mortality associated with early progression to septic shock among ED patients with infection. METHODS: This was a multicenter study of adult ED patients with sepsis but no evidence of shock. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors for early progression to shock and its association with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 472 patients not in shock at ED presentation (systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg and lactate < 4 mmol/L), 84 (17.8%) progressed to shock within 72 hours. Independent factors associated with early progression to shock included older age, female sex, hyperthermia, anemia, comorbid lung disease, and vascular access device infection. Early progression to shock (vs. no progression) was associated with higher 30-day mortality (13.1% vs. 3.1%, odds ratio [OR] = 4.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 11.1; p < or = 0.001). Among 379 patients with uncomplicated sepsis (i.e., no evidence of shock or any end-organ dysfunction), 86 (22.7%) progressed to severe sepsis or shock within 72 hours of hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of ED patients with less severe sepsis progress to severe sepsis or shock within 72 hours. Additional diagnostic approaches are needed to risk stratify and more effectively treat ED patients with sepsis.
BACKGROUND: Aggressive diagnosis and treatment of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock has been shown to reduce mortality. To enhance the ability to intervene in patients with lesser illness severity, a better understanding of the natural history of the early progression from simple infection to more severe illness is needed. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to 1) describe the clinical presentation of ED sepsis, including types of infection and causative microorganisms, and 2) determine the incidence, patient characteristics, and mortality associated with early progression to septic shock among ED patients with infection. METHODS: This was a multicenter study of adult ED patients with sepsis but no evidence of shock. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient factors for early progression to shock and its association with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 472 patients not in shock at ED presentation (systolic blood pressure > 90 mm Hg and lactate < 4 mmol/L), 84 (17.8%) progressed to shock within 72 hours. Independent factors associated with early progression to shock included older age, female sex, hyperthermia, anemia, comorbid lung disease, and vascular access device infection. Early progression to shock (vs. no progression) was associated with higher 30-day mortality (13.1% vs. 3.1%, odds ratio [OR] = 4.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.01 to 11.1; p < or = 0.001). Among 379 patients with uncomplicated sepsis (i.e., no evidence of shock or any end-organ dysfunction), 86 (22.7%) progressed to severe sepsis or shock within 72 hours of hospital admission. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of ED patients with less severe sepsis progress to severe sepsis or shock within 72 hours. Additional diagnostic approaches are needed to risk stratify and more effectively treat ED patients with sepsis.
Authors: H Bryant Nguyen; Emanuel P Rivers; Fredrick M Abrahamian; Gregory J Moran; Edward Abraham; Stephen Trzeciak; David T Huang; Tiffany Osborn; Dennis Stevens; David A Talan Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Stephen Trzeciak; R Phillip Dellinger; Michael E Chansky; Ryan C Arnold; Christa Schorr; Barry Milcarek; Steven M Hollenberg; Joseph E Parrillo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Corinne Alberti; Christian Brun-Buisson; Sylvie Chevret; Massimo Antonelli; Sergey V Goodman; Claudio Martin; Rui Moreno; Ana R Ochagavia; Mark Palazzo; Karl Werdan; Jean Roger Le Gall Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2004-11-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Nathan I Shapiro; Stephen Trzeciak; Judd E Hollander; Robert Birkhahn; Ronny Otero; Tiffany M Osborn; Eugene Moretti; H Bryant Nguyen; Kyle J Gunnerson; David Milzman; David F Gaieski; Munish Goyal; Charles B Cairns; Long Ngo; Emanuel P Rivers Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Michael D Howell; Michael Donnino; Peter Clardy; Daniel Talmor; Nathan I Shapiro Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-07-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ephraim L Tsalik; L Brett Jaggers; Seth W Glickman; Raymond J Langley; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Lawrence P Park; Vance G Fowler; Charles B Cairns; Stephen F Kingsmore; Christopher W Woods Journal: J Emerg Med Date: 2011-11-06 Impact factor: 1.484
Authors: Raymond J Langley; Ephraim L Tsalik; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Seth W Glickman; Brandon J Rice; Chunping Wang; Bo Chen; Lawrence Carin; Arturo Suarez; Robert P Mohney; Debra H Freeman; Mu Wang; Jinsam You; Jacob Wulff; J Will Thompson; M Arthur Moseley; Stephanie Reisinger; Brian T Edmonds; Brian Grinnell; David R Nelson; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Neil A Miller; Carol J Saunders; Sarah S Soden; Angela J Rogers; Lee Gazourian; Laura E Fredenburgh; Anthony F Massaro; Rebecca M Baron; Augustine M K Choi; G Ralph Corey; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Charles B Cairns; Ronny M Otero; Vance G Fowler; Emanuel P Rivers; Christopher W Woods; Stephen F Kingsmore Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Gordon E Carr; Trevor C Yuen; John F McConville; John P Kress; Terry L VandenHoek; Jesse B Hall; Dana P Edelson Journal: Chest Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Aimee K Zaas; Thomas Burke; Minhua Chen; Micah McClain; Bradly Nicholson; Timothy Veldman; Ephraim L Tsalik; Vance Fowler; Emanuel P Rivers; Ronny Otero; Stephen F Kingsmore; Deepak Voora; Joseph Lucas; Alfred O Hero; Lawrence Carin; Christopher W Woods; Geoffrey S Ginsburg Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Raymond J Langley; Jennifer L Tipper; Shannon Bruse; Rebecca M Baron; Ephraim L Tsalik; James Huntley; Angela J Rogers; Richard J Jaramillo; Denise O'Donnell; William M Mega; Mignon Keaton; Elizabeth Kensicki; Lee Gazourian; Laura E Fredenburgh; Anthony F Massaro; Ronny M Otero; Vance G Fowler; Emanuel P Rivers; Chris W Woods; Stephen F Kingsmore; Mohan L Sopori; Mark A Perrella; Augustine M K Choi; Kevin S Harrod Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2014-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Ephraim L Tsalik; Daphne Jones; Bradly Nicholson; Lynette Waring; Oliver Liesenfeld; Lawrence P Park; Seth W Glickman; Lauren B Caram; Raymond J Langley; Jennifer C van Velkinburgh; Charles B Cairns; Emanuel P Rivers; Ronny M Otero; Stephen F Kingsmore; Tahaniyat Lalani; Vance G Fowler; Christopher W Woods Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 5.948