Literature DB >> 10392472

Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental health research.

L H Rogler1.   

Abstract

The concept of procedural norms, which is taken from the analysis of science as an institutionally structured social process, is used to explain the persistence of cultural insensitivity in research. The concept refers to the canons of research that tell scientists what should be studied and how, and they are taught to successive generations of researchers. An examination of cross-cultural studies in mental health reveals that cultural insensitivity stems from procedural norms in the development of content validity based on experts' rational analysis of concepts, in linguistic translations that try to conform to the exact terms of standardized instruments, and in the uncritical transferring of concepts across cultures. We need a wide-ranging examination of our procedural norms, with the objective of keeping such norms from suppressing, biasing, or deflecting cultural understandings. This article proposes a dialogue on the intricate connections between culture and our customary methodologies.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10392472     DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.6.424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  30 in total

1.  Recruiting African Americans into research on cognitive aging.

Authors:  G J McDougall; E C Holston; P Wilke
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of five mental health outcome measures.

Authors:  Leida E Matías-Carrelo; Ligia M Chávez; Gisela Negrón; Glorisa Canino; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Sue Hoppe
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09

3.  Cultural relevance and equivalence in the NLAAS instrument: integrating etic and emic in the development of cross-cultural measures for a psychiatric epidemiology and services study of Latinos.

Authors:  Margarita Alegria; Doryliz Vila; Meghan Woo; Glorisa Canino; David Takeuchi; Mildred Vera; Vivian Febo; Peter Guarnaccia; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Patrick Shrout
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Trends in contacts with mental health professionals and cost barriers to mental health care among adults with significant psychological distress in the United States: 1997-2002.

Authors:  Ramin Mojtabai
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Minority group status and healthful aging: social structure still matters.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Angel; Ronald J Angel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Spirituality among Latinas/os: implications of culture in conceptualization and measurement.

Authors:  Maureen Campesino; Gary E Schwartz
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.824

7.  A comparison of the health of older Hispanics in the United States and Mexico: methodological challenges.

Authors:  Ronald J Angel; Jacqueline L Angel; Terrence D Hill
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2008-02

8.  Differential item functioning between ethnic groups in the epidemiological assessment of depression.

Authors:  Joshua Breslau; Kristin N Javaras; Deborah Blacker; Jane M Murphy; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.254

9.  Sexual values among Latino youth: measurement development using a culturally based approach.

Authors:  Julianna Deardorff; Jeanne M Tschann; Elena Flores
Journal:  Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol       Date:  2008-04

10.  Specifying race-ethnic differences in risk for psychiatric disorder in a USA national sample.

Authors:  Joshua Breslau; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Kenneth S Kendler; Maxwell Su; David Williams; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 7.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.