Literature DB >> 10391266

Radial artery in CABG: could the early results be comparable to internal mammary artery graft?

A Bhan1, V Gupta, S K Choudhary, R Sharma, B Singh, R Aggarwal, B Bhargava, A V Sharma, P Venugopal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The accidental detection of patency of radial artery grafts, by Acar, which had been labeled as blocked 18 years earlier, has led to its revival as a conduit in coronary artery bypass surgery. We used radial artery as one of the grafts in 287 patients from February 1996 to June 1998. Here we present our early clinical experience and the midterm angiographic follow up of the initial 62 patients.
METHODS: A no touch, atraumatic harvesting technique coupled with gentle hydrostatic and pharmacological dilatation of the radial artery graft was employed. Radial artery was used to revascularize coronary vessels with >80% proximal stenosis. Postoperatively, the patients were administered a low dose nifedipine that was continued for 6 months thereafter. The patients were followed up clinically after discharge from the hospital and angiographic evaluation of the grafted radial artery by selective injection was done at a mean interval of 16.2 +/- 5.1 months (3-24 months) postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no perioperative or late myocardial infarction or mortality. No significant complications related to the harvesting of radial artery were encountered. Angiographically, the radial artery grafts were found to be patent in 96.8% of patients (60/62). Mild distal anastomotic narrowing was seen in angiogram of one patient with good filling of the target vessel. Another patient showed diffuse spasm of radial artery graft. The patency of the pedicled left internal mammary grafts was also 98.2% (56/57). All the patients were asymptomatic.
CONCLUSIONS: Radial artery seems to be an excellent alternate arterial conduit for myocardial revascularization with early and midterm patency rates equivalent to that of pedicled internal mammary artery, and it should be used more often for myocardial revascularization as an adjunct to pedicled internal mammary artery graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10391266     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00223-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Sharp dissection versus electrocautery for radial artery harvesting.

Authors:  Mehrab Marzban; Reza Arya; Mohammad Hossein Mandegar; Abbas Ali Karimi; Kiomars Abbasi; Namvar Movahed; Seyed Hesameddin Abbasi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

2.  Radial artery complications occurring after transradial coronary procedures using long hydrophilic-coated introducer sheath: a frequency domain-optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Luca Di Vito; Francesco Burzotta; Carlo Trani; Giancarlo Pirozzolo; Italo Porto; Giampaolo Niccoli; Antonio Maria Leone; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Is it worth placing ventricular pacing wires in all patients post-coronary artery bypass grafting?

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Ishaq Muhammad; Kasra Shaikhrezai; Renzo Pessotto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-05-22

Review 4.  Acute Kidney Injury Post Cardiac Catheterization: Does Vascular Access Route Matter?

Authors:  Pradhum Ram; Benjamin Horn; Kevin Bryan U Lo; Gregg Pressman; Janani Rangaswami
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019

5.  The effect of total arterial grafting on medium-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Légaré; Ansar Hassan; Karen J Buth; John A Sullivan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.637

6.  Correlation between Doppler, Manual Morphometry, and Histopathology Based Morphometry of Radial Artery as a Conduit in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Authors:  Om Prakash Yadava; Vinod Sharma; Arvind Prakash; Vikas Ahlawat; Anirban Kundu; Bikram K Mohanty; Rekha Mishra; Amit K Dinda
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.866

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.