Literature DB >> 10390456

Socioeconomic differences in general practice consultation rates in patients aged 65 and over: prospective cohort study.

R McNiece1, A Majeed.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine socioeconomic differences in general practice consultation rates among patients aged 65 years and over.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the fourth national survey of morbidity in general practice.
SETTING: 60 general practices in England and Wales.
SUBJECTS: 71 984 people aged 65 years and over. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual contact rates and home visiting rates with general practitioners and practice nurses.
RESULTS: Social class differences in tact rates were greatest in 65-74 year olds, with rates 23% higher in patients from social class V than in class I (4.82 v 3.93 per person). In 75-84 year olds there was no clear association between social class and contact rates, and in people aged >/=85 years contact rates were highest in patients from class I. Home visiting rates were twice as high in patients from class V as in patients from class I (1.38 v 0.66 per person). Contact rates were 17% higher in people living in communal establishments and 8% higher in those living alone than in those living with others but not in a communal establishment. 66% of contacts with patients in communal establishments and 26% of those with patients living alone were in patients' homes compared with 18% with those living in standard accommodation. These differences persisted after adjustment in a generalised linear model.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people show socioeconomic differences in consultation rates. The extra workload generated by elderly people living alone and in communal establishments suggests additional payments to general practitioners are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10390456      PMCID: PMC28151          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

1.  The failures of success.

Authors:  E M Gruenberg
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1977

2.  Home visiting by general practitioners in England and Wales.

Authors:  P Aylin; F A Majeed; D G Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-27

3.  Ageing costs. Evidence to royal commission emphasises need for explicit standards and funding.

Authors:  T Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

Review 4.  Long stay care and the NHS: discontinuities between policy and practice.

Authors:  A R Turrell; C M Castleden; B Freestone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-03

5.  The changing face of community and institutional care for the elderly.

Authors:  M Impallomeni; J Starr
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1995-06

6.  Social inequalities in health--do they diminish with age?

Authors:  M Jefferys
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Underprivileged areas: validation and distribution of scores.

Authors:  B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

8.  Health inequalities in later life in a social democratic welfare state.

Authors:  E Dahl; G E Birkelund
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The impact on general practitioners of the changing balance of care for elderly people living in institutions.

Authors:  S Kavanagh; M Knapp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-01

10.  Socioeconomic differences in childhood consultation rates in general practice in England and Wales: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S Saxena; A Majeed; M Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06
View more
  11 in total

1.  Taking STOX: developing a cross disciplinary methodology for systematic reviews of research on the built environment and the health of the public.

Authors:  N Weaver; J L Williams; A L Weightman; H N Kitcher; J M F Temple; P Jones; S Palmer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Future of primary healthcare education: current problems and potential solutions.

Authors:  J Lord
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  The socioeconomic status of older adults: how should we measure it in studies of health inequalities?

Authors:  E Grundy; G Holt
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Equity in GP and specialist contacts by older persons in Belgium.

Authors:  Sarah Hoeck; Johan Van der Heyden; Joanna Geerts; Guido Van Hal
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.380

5.  What determines a patient's treatment? Evidence from out of hours primary care co-op data in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  Grace Lordan
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2007-09

6.  Clinical comorbidity in patients with osteoarthritis: a case-control study of general practice consulters in England and Wales.

Authors:  U T Kadam; K Jordan; P R Croft
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  The impact of mental illness on potentially preventable hospitalisations: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Qun Mai; C D'Arcy J Holman; Frank M Sanfilippo; Jonathan D Emery
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.630

8.  Home visits by family physicians during the end-of-life: Does patient income or residence play a role?

Authors:  Frederick I Burge; Beverley Lawson; Grace Johnston
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 3.234

Review 9.  Access to primary care for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people in rural areas: a realist review.

Authors:  John A Ford; Geoff Wong; Andy P Jones; Nick Steel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

Authors:  Evangelos Kontopantelis; Ivan Olier; Claire Planner; David Reeves; Darren M Ashcroft; Linda Gask; Tim Doran; Siobhan Reilly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.