Literature DB >> 11707484

The socioeconomic status of older adults: how should we measure it in studies of health inequalities?

E Grundy1, G Holt.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To identify which of seven indicators of socioeconomic status used singly or combined with one other would be most useful in studies of health inequalities in the older population.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of socioeconomic and health data in a two wave survey.
SETTING: Great Britain. Participants were interviewed at home by a trained interviewer. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally representative sample of 3543 adults aged 55-69 interviewed in 1988/9, 2243 of whom were interviewed again in 1994.
METHODS: Desirable features of socioeconomic measurement systems for identifying health inequalities in older populations were identified with reference to the literature. Logistic regression was used to examine variations in self reported health by seven indicators of socioeconomic status. The pair of indicators with the greatest explanatory power was identified. MAIN
RESULTS: All indicators were significantly associated with differences in self reported health. The best pair of variables, according to criteria used, was educational qualification or social class paired with a deprivation indicator. DISCUSSION: For a range of reasons the measurement of socioeconomic status is particularly challenging in older age groups. Extending our knowledge of which indicators work well in analyses and are relatively easy to collect should help both further study of health inequalities in the older population and appropriate planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11707484      PMCID: PMC1731799          DOI: 10.1136/jech.55.12.895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  32 in total

1.  Inequalities in health in later life.

Authors:  C R Victor
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 2.  The measurement of social class in epidemiology.

Authors:  P Liberatos; B G Link; J L Kelsey
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

3.  Lifetime socioeconomic position and mortality: prospective observational study.

Authors:  G D Smith; C Hart; D Blane; C Gillis; V Hawthorne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-22

4.  Higher mortality in deprived areas: community or personal disadvantage?

Authors:  A Sloggett; H Joshi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-03

5.  Social class and cardiovascular disease: the contribution of work.

Authors:  M Marmot; T Theorell
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.663

6.  Differences in mortality by housing tenure and by car access from the OPCS Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  H Filakti; J Fox
Journal:  Popul Trends       Date:  1995

7.  Mortality by indicators of socioeconomic status among the Finnish elderly.

Authors:  T Martelin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Occupational careers and mortality of elderly men.

Authors:  D E Moore; M D Hayward
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1990-02

9.  Gender and inequalities in health in later life.

Authors:  S Arber; J Ginn
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study.

Authors:  M G Marmot; M J Shipley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-09
View more
  140 in total

1.  Cancer fatalism and poor self-rated health mediate the association between socioeconomic status and uptake of colorectal cancer screening in England.

Authors:  Anne Miles; Sandra Rainbow; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Comparison of the effects of low childhood socioeconomic position and low adulthood socioeconomic position on self rated health in four European studies.

Authors:  Martin Hyde; Hrkal Jakub; Maria Melchior; Floor Van Oort; Simone Weyers
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Socioeconomic position and self-rated health: the contribution of childhood socioeconomic circumstances, adult socioeconomic status, and material resources.

Authors:  Mikko Laaksonen; Ossi Rahkonen; Pekka Martikainen; Eero Lahelma
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Sociodemographic effects on the dynamics of task-specific ADL functioning at the oldest-old ages: the case of China.

Authors:  Danan Gu; Qin Xu
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2006-11-23

Review 5.  A life-course approach to measuring socioeconomic position in population health surveillance systems.

Authors:  C R Chittleborough; F E Baum; A W Taylor; J E Hiller
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Measuring subjective social status: a case study of older Taiwanese.

Authors:  Noreen Goldman; Jennifer C Cornman; Ming-Cheng Chang
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2006 Mar-Jun

7.  Socioeconomic disparities in optimism and pessimism.

Authors:  Kathryn A Robb; Alice E Simon; Jane Wardle
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2009

8.  Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans.

Authors:  Teresa Bago d'Uva; Owen O'Donnell; Eddy van Doorslaer
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 7.196

9.  Living arrangement concordance and its association with self-rated health among institutionalized and community-residing older adults in China.

Authors:  Melanie D Sereny; Danan Gu
Journal:  J Cross Cult Gerontol       Date:  2011-09

10.  Socioeconomic status and health in the second half of life: findings from the German Ageing Survey.

Authors:  Ina Schöllgen; Oliver Huxhold; Clemens Tesch-Römer
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2010-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.