Literature DB >> 10389726

Test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in the evaluation of urinary incontinence.

S E Swift1, E A Yoon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the test-retest reliability of the cough stress test in women who present with complaints of urinary incontinence.
METHODS: This prospective observational study involved 50 women between the ages of 28 and 78 years with primary complaints of urinary incontinence. All subjects underwent a pelvic examination, cystometrogram, and a cough stress test. The cough stress test was performed in the standing position at a bladder volume of 300 mL or at maximum cystometric capacity if it was less than 300 mL. The results of the cough stress test were recorded as positive if urine loss occurred with a cough or as negative if no urine loss was seen and the bladder volume was recorded. The women returned in 1-4 weeks for a second cough stress test performed at the same bladder volume as at the initial examination.
RESULTS: Of the 50 women studied, 45 (90%) had similar results with both cough stress tests. Thirty-five had a positive cough stress test on the initial examination, and 32 of these patients (91%) also had a positive cough stress test at a repeat visit. Fifteen patients had a negative initial cough stress test, and 13 of these 15 (87%) had a negative cough stress test on repeat examination. All 20 patients diagnosed as having pure genuine stress incontinence had a positive cough stress test on initial and repeat examinations. Of the 15 patients diagnosed with detrusor instability or sensory urge incontinence, 13 (86%) had negative cough stress tests on initial and repeat examinations. Of the 15 patients diagnosed with mixed incontinence, 12 (80%) had positive cough stress tests on initial and repeat examinations.
CONCLUSION: The cough stress test appears to be a reliable test. The reliability is more consistent in women with a diagnosis of pure genuine stress incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10389726     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00314-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers.

Authors:  Andrew F Hundley; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

Review 2.  Measuring outcomes in urogynecological surgery: "perspective is everything".

Authors:  Candace Y Parker-Autry; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly Kenton; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Transobturator mid-urethral sling in females with stress urinary incontinence and detrusor underactivity: effect on voiding phase.

Authors:  Franca Natale; Ester Illiano; Alessandro Zucchi; Matteo Balzarro; Chiara La Penna; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Urethral pressure reflectometry in women with pelvic organ prolapse: a study of reproducibility.

Authors:  Yasmine Khayyami; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  A multicentered comparison of measurements obtained with microtip and external water pressure transducers.

Authors:  Andrew F Hundley; Morton B Brown; Linda Brubaker; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Karl Kreder; Peter Lotze; Holly E Richter; Halina Zyczynski; Anne M Weber; Anthony G Visco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-11-12

6.  Comparison of the cough stress test and 24-h pad test in the assessment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Danielle Markle Price; Karen Noblett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Outcome measures for stress urinary incontinence treatment: can we minimally agree?

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Philippe Zimmern; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Aoki; Heidi W Brown; Linda Brubaker; Jean Nicolas Cornu; J Oliver Daly; Rufus Cartwright
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 52.329

9.  Factors predictive of outcome in tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Elke Van Den Abbeele; Hellen Nagel; Patrick Haentjens
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

10.  When to perform urodynamics before mid-urethral sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  R Marijn Houwert; Jan Paul W R Roovers; Pieter L Venema; Hein W Bruinse; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Harry A M Vervest
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.