Literature DB >> 10387035

Structural features and light-dependent changes in the sequence 306-322 extending from helix VII to the palmitoylation sites in rhodopsin: a site-directed spin-labeling study.

C Altenbach1, K Cai, H G Khorana, W L Hubbell.   

Abstract

Sixteen single-cysteine substitution mutants of rhodopsin were prepared in the sequence 306-321 which begins in transmembrane helix VII and ends at the palmitoylation sites at 322C and 323C. The substituted cysteine residues were modified with a selective reagent to generate a nitroxide side chain, and the electron paramagnetic resonance spectrum of each spin-labeled mutant was analyzed in terms of residue accessibility and mobility. The periodic behavior of these parameters along the sequence indicated that residues 306-314 were in a regular alpha-helical conformation representing the end of helix VII. This helix apparently extends about 1.5 turns above the surface of the membrane, with one face in strong tertiary interaction with the core of the protein. For the segment 315-321, substituted cysteine residues at 317, 318, 320, and 321 had low reactivity with the spin-label reagent. This segment has the most extensive tertiary interactions yet observed in the rhodopsin extra-membrane sequences at the cytoplasmic surface. Previous studies showed the spontaneous formation of a disulfide bond between cysteine residues at 65 and 316. This result indicates that at least some of the tertiary contacts made in the 315-321 segment are with the sequence connecting transmembrane helices I and II. Photoactivation of rhodopsin produces changes in structure detected by spin labels at 306, 313, and 316. The changes at 313 can be accounted for by movements in the adjacent helix VI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10387035     DOI: 10.1021/bi9900121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  30 in total

1.  Solution 19F nuclear Overhauser effects in structural studies of the cytoplasmic domain of mammalian rhodopsin.

Authors:  M C Loewen; J Klein-Seetharaman; E V Getmanova; P J Reeves; H Schwalbe; H G Khorana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assembly of a polytopic membrane protein structure from the solution structures of overlapping peptide fragments of bacteriorhodopsin.

Authors:  M Katragadda; J L Alderfer; P L Yeagle
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Site-directed spin labeling of a bacterial chemoreceptor reveals a dynamic, loosely packed transmembrane domain.

Authors:  Alexander Barnakov; Christian Altenbach; Ludmila Barnakova; Wayne L Hubbell; Gerald L Hazelbauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Role of the conserved NPxxY(x)5,6F motif in the rhodopsin ground state and during activation.

Authors:  Olaf Fritze; Sławomir Filipek; Vladimir Kuksa; Krzysztof Palczewski; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Oliver P Ernst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  G protein-coupled receptor drug discovery: implications from the crystal structure of rhodopsin.

Authors:  J Ballesteros; K Palczewski
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2001-09

6.  Surface masking shapes the traffic of the neuropeptide Y Y2 receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Parker; Renu Sah; Steven L Parker
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.750

7.  Electron paramagnetic resonance and fluorescence studies of the conformation of aspartate aminotransferase bound to GroEL.

Authors:  Alan Berezov; Megan J McNeill; Ana Iriarte; Marino Martinez-Carrion
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.371

Review 8.  Homology modeling of opioid receptor-ligand complexes using experimental constraints.

Authors:  Irina D Pogozheva; Magdalena J Przydzial; Henry I Mosberg
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

9.  Comparison of class A and D G protein-coupled receptors: common features in structure and activation.

Authors:  Markus Eilers; Viktor Hornak; Steven O Smith; James B Konopka
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  G protein coupled receptor structure and activation.

Authors:  Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.