Literature DB >> 10384178

Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

H Reichenspurner1, R J Damiano, M Mack, D H Boehm, H Gulbins, C Detter, B Meiser, R Ellgass, B Reichart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With the aim of performing a completely endoscopic coronary bypass anastomosis, we have undertaken an experimental and clinical study using robotic instrumentation and voice-controlled camera guidance.
METHODS: The ZEUS Robotic Surgical System (Computer Motion Inc, Goleta, Calif) consists of three interactive robotic arms and a control unit, allowing the surgeon to move the instrument arms in a scaled down mode. The third arm (AESOP, Computer Motion) positions the endoscope via voice control. PHASE I: In a phantom model, vascular grafts were anastomosed to the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) of 50 pig hearts with either 2- or 3-dimensional visualization. PHASE II: In 6 dogs (FBI 20-25 kg) the left internal thoracic artery (LITA) was harvested endoscopically. Then the animals were placed on an endovascular cardiopulmonary bypass system (Port-Access, Heartport, Inc, Redwood City, Calif). Anastomosis of the LITA to the LAD was performed endoscopically with the telemetric ZEUS instruments. Flow rates through the LITA were measured by Doppler analysis. PHASE III: Two patients were operated on with the ZEUS system. After endoscopic harvesting of the LITA and cardiopulmonary bypass with the Port-Access system, the bypass graft (LITA-LAD) was anastomosed endoscopically with the ZEUS system through three thoracic ports.
RESULTS: In the dry laboratory, the time range required for the robotically assisted coronary anastomosis was 35 to 60 minutes with 2-dimensional visualization and 16 to 32 minutes with 3-dimensional visualization. In the animal experiments, the median time for endoscopic harvesting of the LITA was 86 minutes (range 56-120 minutes) and for the anastomosis, 42 minutes (range 35-105 minutes); flow rates through the LITA ranged between 22 and 45 mL/min. In the clinical cases, preparation times for the LITA were 83 and 110 minutes, respectively, and anastomosis times, 42 and 40 minutes, respectively. Doppler flow rates measured 125 and 85 mL/min, respectively. Both patients had an uneventful follow-up angiogram and postoperative course.
CONCLUSIONS: With sophisticated robotic technology, a completely endoscopic anastomosis of the LITA to the LAD is possible, allowing technically precise operations within acceptable time limits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10384178     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70134-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  19 in total

1.  Laparoscopy and the internet. A surgeon survey.

Authors:  A Gandsas; K Draper; E Chekan; M Garcia-Oria; R L McMahon; E M Clary; R Monnig; S Eubanks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.

Authors:  G Hubens; H Coveliers; L Balliu; M Ruppert; W Vaneerdeweg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Treatment of coronary heart disease with minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M A Wait
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2000-04

5.  A cost evaluation methodology for surgical technologies.

Authors:  Imad Ismail; Sandrine Wolff; Agnes Gronfier; Didier Mutter; Lee L Swanström; Lee L Swantröm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].

Authors:  D S Schoeb; J Rassweiler; A Sigle; A Miernik; C Engels; A S Goezen; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Robotics in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  A H Sepehripour; G Garas; T Athanasiou; R Casula
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  History of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Satyam Kalan; Sanket Chauhan; Rafael F Coelho; Marcelo A Orvieto; Ignacio R Camacho; Kenneth J Palmer; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-07-22

Review 9.  Robotic thymectomy.

Authors:  Giuseppe Marulli; Giovanni Maria Comacchio; Federico Rea
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 10.  [Robots in urology-an analysis of current and future devices].

Authors:  J J Rassweiler; A S Goezen; M C Rassweiler-Seyfried; E Liatsikos; T Bach; J-U Stolzenburg; J Klein
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.