Literature DB >> 10382648

Comparison of three protocols for the isolation of Arcobacter from poultry.

L G Johnson1, E A Murano.   

Abstract

The microaerophilic bacterium Arcobacter has received increasing attention in recent years regarding its presence in food products. There exist a limited number of methods for the detection of this microorganism, with currently available methods being cumbersome to perform, time consuming, and limited in specificity. The objective of this study was to develop a selective enrichment broth to isolate accurately three Arcobacter spp. from concentrated chicken microflora by comparing the efficacy of various selective and growth-promoting additives in order. This newly developed enrichment broth was incorporated into an isolation protocol using a previously developed plating medium, and this new protocol was compared with two existing methods for the isolation of Arcobacter from poultry. Method 1 consisted of enrichment in Ellinghausen-McCullough-Johnson-Harris Polysorbate 80 broth followed by plating on cefoperazone-vancomycin-amphotericin B medium. Method 2 consisted of enrichment in Arcobacter selective broth and plating onto Arcobacter selective medium. Method 3 (the JM method), used a newly developed enrichment broth followed by plating on a previously described JM agar. The JM method isolated Arcobacter strains in 42 out of 50 broiler chicken samples, while methods 1 and 2 detected the organism in only 24 and 15 out of 50 samples, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10382648     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.6.610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  8 in total

Review 1.  Taxonomy, epidemiology, and clinical relevance of the genus Arcobacter.

Authors:  Luis Collado; Maria José Figueras
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Fecal shedding of Campylobacter and Arcobacter spp. in dairy cattle.

Authors:  I V Wesley; S J Wells; K M Harmon; A Green; L Schroeder-Tucker; M Glover; I Siddique
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Susceptibility of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter cryaerophilus, and Arcobacter skirrowii to antimicrobial agents used in selective media.

Authors:  K Houf; L A Devriese; L De Zutter; J Van Hoof; P Vandamme
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Modified isolation method of Arcobacter spp. from different environmental and food samples.

Authors:  David Šilha; Lucie Šilhová-Hrušková; Jarmila Vytřasová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Comparison of conventional PCR, multiplex PCR, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays for rapid detection of Arcobacter species.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Wang; Dong Joo Seo; Min Hwa Lee; Changsun Choi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Isolation of Arcobacter butzleri and A. cryaerophilus in samples of meats and from meat-processing plants by a culture technique and detection by PCR.

Authors:  J Vytrasová; M Pejchalová; K Harsová; S Bínová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  Improved culture enrichment broth for isolation of Arcobacter-like species from the marine environment.

Authors:  Faiz Ur Rahman; Karl B Andree; Nuria Salas-Massó; Margarita Fernandez-Tejedor; Anna Sanjuan; Maria J Figueras; M Dolors Furones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Persistence of Arcobacter butzleri CCUG 30484 on plastic, stainless steel and glass surfaces.

Authors:  Libor Cervenka; Jana Kristlova; Iva Peskova; Jarmila Vytrasova; Marcela Pejchalova; Iveta Brozkova
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.