Literature DB >> 10382243

Reconstruction after multilevel corpectomy in the cervical spine. A sagittal plane biomechanical study.

J S Kirkpatrick1, J A Levy, J Carillo, S R Moeini.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An in vitro biomechanical study of reconstruction techniques used after multilevel cervical corpectomy.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the biomechanical behavior of the cervical spine after a multilevel corpectomy and reconstruction with a strut graft and supplementation of the graft with anterior and posterior plates. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Reconstruction of the spine after multilevel corpectomy represents a significant challenge, with nonunion or graft dislodgment being relatively common. Anterior and posterior plate fixation have increased the possibilities for supplemental stabilization. Although some clinical studies have been performed to examine multilevel corpectomies reconstructed with plates, biomechanical studies are few and are limited to single-segment models.
METHODS: Flexibility testing was performed on 11 intact cervical spine preparations. Flexibility testing was also conducted on the spine preparations after reconstruction with a strut graft, after supplementation of the graft with an anterior plate, and after supplementation of the graft with lateral mass plates. Physiologic moments were applied dynamically, and the three-dimensional motion of the specimen was recorded with stereophoto-grammetry. Failure testing was performed on the plated specimens in compression. Load displacement curves and failure modes were analyzed.
RESULTS: The range of motion after reconstruction compared with the control was decreased 24% after strut grafting, 43% after application of an anterior plate, and 62% after application of posterior plates. Similarly, flexibility coefficients showed that the posterior plate technique was the least flexible, followed by the anterior plate technique, with the graft alone being the most flexible reconstruction construct. Load to initial failure tended to be higher in posterior than in anterior plate specimens, and screw pullout was the predominant failure mode.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of plates to the cervical spine as an adjunct to bone graft may improve the surgeon's ability to stabilize the spine after multilevel corpectomy. Understanding the biomechanics of these devices and the potential mode of failure is important in their use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10382243     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199906150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  15 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebral body replacement in spine surgery].

Authors:  F Kandziora; K J Schnake; C K Klostermann; N P Haas
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Mark Tauber; Michael Fox; Hudelmaier Martin; Rosmarie Forstner; Peter Augat; Rainer Penzkofer; Christian Pirich; H Kässmann; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Frank Acosta; Michael Fox; Armin Scheiter; Mark Tauber; Ulrich Holz; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Morphometry of typical cervical vertebrae on dry bones and CT scan and its implications in transpedicular screw placement surgery.

Authors:  Richa Gupta; Kanchan Kapoor; Anshu Sharma; Suman Kochhar; Rajeev Garg
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-09-09       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Four-level anterior cervical discectomies and cage-augmented fusion with and without fixation.

Authors:  Mootaz Shousha; Ali Ezzati; Heinrich Boehm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Biomechanics of Cervical "Skip" Corpectomy Versus Standard Multilevel Corpectomy.

Authors:  Murat Yilmaz; Kasim Zafer Yüksel; Seungwon Baek; Anna G U S Newcomb; Sedat Dalbayrak; Volker K H Sonntag; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Qiushui Lin; Xuhui Zhou; Xinwei Wang; Peng Cao; Nicholas Tsai; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Surgical results of anterior corpectomy in the aged patients with cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Xiaotao Wu; Yonggang Li; Xiangfei Kong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy.

Authors:  Sebastian Hartmann; Claudius Thomé; Alexander Keiler; Helga Fritsch; Aldemar Andres Hegewald; Werner Schmölz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.