P Deurenberg1, M Deurenberg Yap, J Wang, F P Lin, G Schmidt. 1. Department of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands. paul.deurenberg@staff.nutepi.wau.nl
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that differences in the relationship between percent body fat (%BF) and body mass index (BMI) between populations can be explained (in part) by differences in body build. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, comparative study. SUBJECTS: 120 age, gender and BMI matched Singapore Chinese, Beijing Chinese and Dutch (Wageningen) Caucasians. MEASUREMENTS: From body weight and body height, BMI was calculated. Relative sitting height (sitting height/height) was used as a measure of relative leg length. Body fat was determined using densitometry (underwater weighing) in Beijing and Wageningen and using a three-compartment model based on densitometry and hydrometry in Singapore. Wrist and knee widths were measured as indicators for frame size and skeletal mass was calculated based on height, wrist and knee width. In addition, a slenderness index (height/sum of wrist and knee width) was calculated. RESULTS: For the same BMI, Singapore Chinese had the highest %BF followed by Beijing Chinese and the Dutch Caucasians. Singaporean Chinese had a more slender frame than Beijing Chinese and Dutch Caucasians. Predicted %BF from BMI, using a Caucasian prediction formula, was not different from measured %BF in Wageningen and in Beijing, but in Singapore the formula underpredicted %BF by 4.0 +/- 0.8% (mean +/- s.e.m.) compared to Wageningen. The difference between measured and predicted %BF (bias) was related to the level of %BF and with measures of body build, especially slenderness. Correction for differences in %BF, slenderness and relative sitting height, decreased the differences between measured and predicted values compared to the Dutch group from 1.4 +/- 0.8 (not statistically significant, NS) to -0.2 +/- 0.5 (NS) in Beijing and from 4.0 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.05) to 0.3 +/- 0.5 (NS) in Singapore (all values mean +/- s.e.m.). CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirm the hypothesis that differences in body build are at least partly responsible for a different relationship between BMI and %BF among different (ethnic) groups.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that differences in the relationship between percent body fat (%BF) and body mass index (BMI) between populations can be explained (in part) by differences in body build. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, comparative study. SUBJECTS: 120 age, gender and BMI matched Singapore Chinese, Beijing Chinese and Dutch (Wageningen) Caucasians. MEASUREMENTS: From body weight and body height, BMI was calculated. Relative sitting height (sitting height/height) was used as a measure of relative leg length. Body fat was determined using densitometry (underwater weighing) in Beijing and Wageningen and using a three-compartment model based on densitometry and hydrometry in Singapore. Wrist and knee widths were measured as indicators for frame size and skeletal mass was calculated based on height, wrist and knee width. In addition, a slenderness index (height/sum of wrist and knee width) was calculated. RESULTS: For the same BMI, Singapore Chinese had the highest %BF followed by Beijing Chinese and the Dutch Caucasians. Singaporean Chinese had a more slender frame than Beijing Chinese and Dutch Caucasians. Predicted %BF from BMI, using a Caucasian prediction formula, was not different from measured %BF in Wageningen and in Beijing, but in Singapore the formula underpredicted %BF by 4.0 +/- 0.8% (mean +/- s.e.m.) compared to Wageningen. The difference between measured and predicted %BF (bias) was related to the level of %BF and with measures of body build, especially slenderness. Correction for differences in %BF, slenderness and relative sitting height, decreased the differences between measured and predicted values compared to the Dutch group from 1.4 +/- 0.8 (not statistically significant, NS) to -0.2 +/- 0.5 (NS) in Beijing and from 4.0 +/- 0.8 (P < 0.05) to 0.3 +/- 0.5 (NS) in Singapore (all values mean +/- s.e.m.). CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirm the hypothesis that differences in body build are at least partly responsible for a different relationship between BMI and %BF among different (ethnic) groups.
Authors: Fahad Javed; Emad F Aziz; Manpreet S Sabharwal; Girish N Nadkarni; Shahzeb A Khan; Juan P Cordova; Alexandre M Benjo; Dympna Gallagher; Eyal Herzog; Franz H Messerli; F Xavier Pi-Sunyer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ailing Liu; Andrew P Hills; Xiaoqi Hu; Yanping Li; Lin Du; Ying Xu; Nuala M Byrne; Guansheng Ma Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 3.295