PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the role of MRI including MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ERCP and MRI including MRCP were performed in 52 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. MRCP was obtained using a single-shot RARE technique. The results of axial images and MRCP were compared to concurrently performed ERCP examinations. The standards of reference were the surgical and pathological findings, respectively. Image quality of MRCP was assessed using a three-step-score (1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = nondiagnostic). RESULTS: In 88% of the cases the MRCP was of good quality. Only in 4% was MRCP non-diagnostic. The combination of MRI and MRCP showed an overall accuracy of 88%, whereas the overall accuracies of MRCP alone and ERCP were 80%, and 85%, respectively. The positive predictive values of MRI/MRCP, MRCP alone, and ERCP were 91%, 85%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For the detection of pancreatic cancer MRI including MRCP is comparable to ERCP and can be regarded as the method of choice in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. ERCP is the procedure of choice in patients with contraindications to MRI and in patients in whom additional therapeutic procedures are performed.
PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate the role of MRI including MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ERCP and MRI including MRCP were performed in 52 patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. MRCP was obtained using a single-shot RARE technique. The results of axial images and MRCP were compared to concurrently performed ERCP examinations. The standards of reference were the surgical and pathological findings, respectively. Image quality of MRCP was assessed using a three-step-score (1 = good, 2 = fair, 3 = nondiagnostic). RESULTS: In 88% of the cases the MRCP was of good quality. Only in 4% was MRCP non-diagnostic. The combination of MRI and MRCP showed an overall accuracy of 88%, whereas the overall accuracies of MRCP alone and ERCP were 80%, and 85%, respectively. The positive predictive values of MRI/MRCP, MRCP alone, and ERCP were 91%, 85%, and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For the detection of pancreatic cancer MRI including MRCP is comparable to ERCP and can be regarded as the method of choice in patients with suspected pancreatic cancer. ERCP is the procedure of choice in patients with contraindications to MRI and in patients in whom additional therapeutic procedures are performed.
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17
Authors: Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: T Peter Kingham; Victoria G Aveson; Alice C Wei; Jason A Castellanos; Peter J Allen; Daniel P Nussbaum; Yinin Hu; Michael I D'Angelica Journal: Curr Probl Surg Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Mehmet Bilgin; Hüseyin Toprak; Mehmet Burgazli; S Sennur Bilgin; Ritvan Chasan; Ali Erdogan; Cem Balcı Journal: ScientificWorldJournal Date: 2012-03-12
Authors: Jing Huang; Jianzhou Liu; Kevin Chen-Xiao; Xuemei Zhang; W N Paul Lee; Vay Liang W Go; Gary Guishan Xiao Journal: Biomark Res Date: 2016-10-22