Literature DB >> 10369795

Effect of externally applied focused acoustic energy on clot disruption in vitro.

S Westermark1, H Wiksell, H Elmqvist, K Hultenby, H Berglund.   

Abstract

Application of low-frequency ultrasound for clot disruption has been suggested as a potential therapy to enhance thrombus dissolution, but the optimal mode for delivery of ultrasound with clot-disruptive properties has not yet been extensively explored. Target-specific effects are desirable and may be accomplished by focusing the ultrasound. Adequate focusing, however, requires a short wavelength. The aim of this study was to compare the clot-disruptive effects of different modalities of focused acoustic energy. An in vitro model (10 blood clots for each modality) was used to test the clot-disruptive capacity of (i) shock waves generated in an electrohydraulic lithotriptor; (ii) focused continuous ultrasound of frequency 1.1 MHz, delivered from a specially constructed piezoelectric transducer; and (iii) focused pulse-modulated ultrasound of frequency 1.1 MHz delivered from the same transducer. Exposure to 30 s of focused pulse-modulated ultrasound caused a marked reduction (99+/-2%) in clot weight compared with 30 shock waves (11+/-5%) or 30 s exposure to focused continuous wave ultrasound (11+/-6%) (P<0.0001). The observed marked and rapid disruptive effect on blood clots of focused high-frequency ultrasound indicates an alternative approach for external ultrasound-mediated thrombus destruction in vivo. The focused pulse-modulated technique has potential to exhibit the desired effect in a well-defined target volume and provides the means for control of the average power.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10369795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)        ISSN: 0143-5221            Impact factor:   6.124


  8 in total

1.  In vitro and in vivo high-intensity focused ultrasound thrombolysis.

Authors:  Cameron Wright; Kullervo Hynynen; David Goertz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 2.  Sonothrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Guillaume Bouchoux; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Shaken and stirred: mechanisms of ultrasound-enhanced thrombolysis.

Authors:  Kenneth B Bader; Matthew J Gruber; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy - histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Alexander P Duryea; Lingqian Yuan; Hitinder S Gurm; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for dissolution of clots in a rabbit model of embolic stroke.

Authors:  Alison Burgess; Yuexi Huang; Adam C Waspe; Milan Ganguly; David E Goertz; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Improved thrombolytic effect with focused ultrasound and neuroprotective agent against acute carotid artery thrombosis in rat.

Authors:  Tsong-Hai Lee; Jih-Chao Yeh; Chih-Hung Tsai; Jen-Tsung Yang; Shyh-Liang Lou; Chen-June Seak; Chao-Yung Wang; Kuo-Chen Wei; Hao-Li Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  In vitro demonstration of focused ultrasound thrombolysis using bifrequency excitation.

Authors:  Izella Saletes; Bruno Gilles; Vincent Auboiroux; Nadia Bendridi; Rares Salomir; Jean-Christophe Béra
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Neurosurgery: Taking Lessons from the Past to Inform the Future.

Authors:  Na Young Jung; Jin Woo Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.