Literature DB >> 10368490

Young age as a prognostic factor in cervical cancer: results of a population-based study.

W R Brewster1, P J DiSaia, B J Monk, A Ziogas, S D Yamada, H Anton-Culver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to use population-based data to determine the difference in 5-year survival in women diagnosed with cervical cancer between those aged 18-34 years and those aged 40-60 years. STUDY
DESIGN: The SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) public-use database, 1973-1994, was used for this investigation. Only subjects with cervical carcinoma diagnosed between 1988 and 1990 were included. Subjects were stratified on age at diagnosis (<35 years or 40-60 years), clinical stage, histologic type, race-ethnicity, and grade.
RESULTS: Two thousand cases of invasive cervical cancer were identified. The younger subgroup of patients was diagnosed with earlier-stage disease more frequently than the older group (P =.0001). When adjustments were made for non-cervical cancer causes of death, there was no difference in 5-year survival between the 2 cohorts. African American women had a poorer 5-year survival (P =.02)
CONCLUSION: There was no overall difference in survival between the 2 cohorts when appropriate adjustments were made for cause of death and for stage, histologic type, and grade of disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368490     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70038-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Tumor size and lymph node status determined by imaging are reliable factors for predicting advanced cervical cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Min Sun Kyung; Hong Bae Kim; Jung Yeob Seoung; In Young Choi; Young Soo Joo; Me Yeon Lee; Jung Bae Kang; Young Han Park
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  Amputation of uterine corpus as the intraoperative modification during cesarean radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer during pregnancy.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Takayuki Enomoto; Masato Yamasaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Racial differences in cervical cancer survival in the Detroit metropolitan area.

Authors:  Sujana Movva; Anne-Michelle Noone; Mousumi Banerjee; Divya A Patel; Kendra Schwartz; Cecilia L Yee; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Histological type-specific prognostic factors of cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Suthida Intaraphet; Nongyao Kasatpibal; Mette Søgaard; Surapan Khunamornpong; Jayanton Patumanond; Anchalee Chandacham; Imjai Chitapanarux; Sumalee Siriaunkgul
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The value of prognostic factors for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with irradiation alone.

Authors:  Rūta Grigiene; Konstantinas P Valuckas; Eduardas Aleknavicius; Juozas Kurtinaitis; Simona R Letautiene
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  An examination of racial differences in 5-year survival of cervical cancer among African American and white American women in the southeastern US from 1985 to 2010.

Authors:  Janaka Weragoda; Andres Azuero; Suguna Badiga; Walter C Bell; Roland Matthews; Chandrika Piyathilake
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.452

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.