Literature DB >> 10368193

A comparison of prelubricated hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic polyvinyl chloride catheters for urethral catheterization.

J Pachler1, C Frimodt-Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patients performing clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) for a short period preferred a prelubricated, hydrophilic, disposable polyvinyl chloride (PVC) catheter or a non-hydrophilic PVC catheter which could be used several times and that had to be lubricated by the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective cross-over study, 32 patients used each type of catheter for 3 weeks. After each 3-week period, the patients completed a questionnaire to assess comfort and preference, and urine specimens were obtained for culture.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the frequency of CISC, discomfort when used, opinion on handling the catheters, preference toward one of the catheters, or of infection.
CONCLUSION: Non-hydrophilic PVC catheters may be used safely and with no discomfort to the patient. In addition it may be possible for the healthcare system to save money, as the non-hydrophilic PVC catheters are much cheaper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368193     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.00013.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

Review 1.  Catheters for intermittent catheterization: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donghui Ye; Yuntian Chen; Zhongyu Jian; Banghua Liao; Xi Jin; Liyuan Xiang; Hong Li; Kunjie Wang
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.

Authors:  Jacqui Prieto; Catherine L Murphy; Katherine N Moore; Mandy Fader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 3.  Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Shamout; X Biardeau; J Corcos; L Campeau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 4.  Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long-term bladder conditions.

Authors:  Jacqui A Prieto; Catherine L Murphy; Fiona Stewart; Mandy Fader
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-26

5.  Hydrophilic catheters: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-03-01

6.  Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2019-02-19

Review 7.  Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Carla Rognoni; Rosanna Tarricone
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Clinical efficacy of retrograde urethrography-assisted urethral catheterization after failed conventional urethral catheterization.

Authors:  Si Hyun Kim; Hee Jo Yang; Doo Sang Kim; Chang Ho Lee; Youn Soo Jeon; Ki Hong Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.264

Review 9.  Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Liao; Yuwei Liu; Shiqi Liang; Ka Li
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 10.  Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Sarah L Bermingham; Sarah Hodgkinson; Sue Wright; Ellie Hayter; Julian Spinks; Carol Pellowe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.